The mob that make me laugh more are the ones that say Tyson wasn't a big puncher it was the combinations.
The fuck can anyone seriously watch Tyson and think - nahh he's not a powerful puncher he just throws lots.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
The mob that make me laugh more are the ones that say Tyson wasn't a big puncher it was the combinations.
The fuck can anyone seriously watch Tyson and think - nahh he's not a powerful puncher he just throws lots.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Mike Tyson's one-punched so many dudes unconscious. I can't think of anyone who has so many KO's by one punch with either hand, except maybe Julian Jackson
Array
His success did not just depend on his speed, combinations, huge punch with either hand, fierce competitive spirit or an innate ability to almost always be in position to deliver something big. His success depended on a combination of all these abilities, so I think you can say all the great punchers were combination punchers in that way.
Butterbean has a huge punch. Galento had a huge punch. Neither one of these guys are going to show up on an all time great punchers list, not anywhere near the top.
As to why Tyson comes before or after some other big puncher on a list, it's just an opinion and everyone has one.
We haven't even talked about the drugs and roids? Tyson took. Did those help or hurt him? What would they have done for Louis' or Marciano's careers?
Array
I reckon that there were people who were a bit more heavy handed than Iron Mike, such as Big George Foreman and (arguably) people like Marciano and some fringe contenders like Gerry Cooney ....... But Tyson was one of the best FINISHERS I've ever seen.
Sure, he blew out lots of people early on with one punch, but by and large they were early career cannon fodder. Later on, if you notice, he didn't get that many one punch kayos. The ref either stopped it, of he was onto them and he closed the show.
Along with the Manassa Mauler, Iron Mike was an electrifying finisher and he stands comparison in that regard with any heavyweight that walked into a ring
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Array
yeah, you could argue that. The point I was trying to make is that Berbick and Williams (at least) were actually stopped on their feet. They had got up but were in no fit state to continue. Spinks had already been knocked down, and Tyson then finished him off. I think Tyson was a fearsome puncher, but in his prime he didn't overly rely on that like he did later, he threw combinations and it was his skill at finishing off people that was his greatest strength rather than his pure punching power.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Array
Combination of technique, snap, and punch placement, prime tyson was the best HW puncher of all time.. plus he was probably the best body puncher too.
Array
tyson was also Brunos bogey man
bruno being the best HW of all time thats something not to be sniffed at
Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend
I would say Tyson has to be in the argument. I would agree in his heyday the best pure puncher ever. George Foreman is bigger but doesn't have the hand speed in his prime. His punches were heavy, but he didn't have the snap. Tyson had hand speed close to Floyd Patterson, and with Tyson's weight advantage he has the power edge. Frazier, Gerry Conney (hook alone), are the only other ones I can say have power. Current crop - forget about it. Just to qualify, I am rating 70's and later, I can't say Marciano, Johnson, Johannson because I just don't know. Great subject.
Last edited by vfurlani; 02-01-2014 at 08:51 PM.
Mike naturally has a great punch but let us not forget that on certain days we don't always have that energy and power in full gear so the speed must be worked on and the combinations have to be thrown with good timing. My assessment of Mike is that he as a monster with the one punch knockout power but those combinations he hit you with made you wish you did a swan dive in round one because they looked crippling but mark my words the only reason someone would be standing a little longer was because he did not make himself available for destruction and after a while Mike's blows made guys argue with their legs to get them the hell out of there.. People like Foreman had strength but they didn't use angles like Mike who was a true student of boxing history but the partying conflicted with his receiving a PHD in pugilism. Gerry Cooney well what can I say, Larry Holmes didn't feel like giving up the title and he played a good psychological game even though at the time I wondered if he could even spell the word he had an excellent night and fought intelligently.
What many forget and you are right on the money was early in his career he got his PHD in pugilism as you properly say. He had great combos. He was viscous with his Hooks and Uppercuts. He max combo's where 3 or 4 punches. Unfortunately that PHD turned into Dr. Kovorkian and good went to bad. Then he lost his heart.
I think the bottom line is if you take a young angry kid with FANTASTIC genetics and natural athleticism, power and speed, and you make him live with a legendary boxing trainer, where he does nothing but train, study old films of all of boxing's greatest fighters and dream about being a world champ... eventually he's going to be really good a knocking motherfuckers out.
I can't say I would argue with that. I heard a quote from him months ago, that said something like, "You know what a tragedy is? Give a 20 year old millions of dollars and let him do whatever he wants....that's a tragedy" If he only knew then what he knows now how different would history have been. LOL.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks