Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58

Thread: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,318
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Tyson may not be the greatest puncher of all time because he relied too much on speed, timing, combinations and not raw power.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    6,007
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    824
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson may not be the greatest puncher of all time because he relied too much on speed, timing, combinations and not raw power.
    Tyson's timing was impeccable... accurate and timed precisely.
    Bigger man George, bigger punch!

    Subscribe: Free online Classifieds and Business directory!
    Hidden Content

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,318
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Tyson may not be the greatest puncher of all time because he relied too much on speed, timing, combinations and not raw power.
    Tyson's timing was impeccable... accurate and timed precisely.
    He also weighed only 220lb. I am sounding like Max Power now, where is that twat gone?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    806
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    I will probably get alot of shit for saying this but Tyson is underrated. Even tho he is underrated he still should have been better than what he was.

    Why is he underrated? For the exact reason the OP started this thread. Tyson has more 1st round KO's than anyone ever im sure and this in itself proves he is the best puncher/KO artist of all time. No one KO'd dudes like Tyson.

    Its easy to forget what Tyson did and remember what he didnt do (understandably so).

    We have never had to wonder so much about what a fighter could have been. And we have never seen a fighter not live up to there potential so much has Tyson but he is still an ATG. Its as amazing as it is disappointing.
    Last edited by cambay411; 01-29-2014 at 06:53 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    He's in my top 3 because of his delivery of punch, and all aspects together.

    But in terms of pure power alone, it's close between a lot of fighters.

    Frank Bruno had an absolutely, devastatingly powerful right hand, but nowhere near the speed, agility or technique Tyson had. I remember reading something about a test they did with Bruno on his punch and the power was apparently incredibly high.

    Lots of people have power but Tyson knew how to use it.
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    He's in my top 3 because of his delivery of punch, and all aspects together.

    But in terms of pure power alone, it's close between a lot of fighters.
    Agreed 100%. In terms of pure power, I think there are probably a bunch of guys that trump Tyson. Guys like Foreman and Shavers had more pure power than him I'd be willing to bet.

    If we're talking about the overall force of the punch, I'd say Tyson's speed and technique probably leveled it out though.

    But who are your other top 3 punchers, or specifically the ones you would rate above Tyson at HW?

  7. #7
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Tyson is up there, fast hands, good power with both hands.


    Joe Louis
    George Foreman
    Lennox Lewis
    Rocky Marciano
    Jack Dempsey
    Vitali Klitschko
    Wladimir Klitschko
    Ron Lyle
    Earnie Shavers

    There are plenty to consider, but I'd say Prime Tyson is no lower than Top 5. I would put Louis, Marciano, and Foreman at or around the same ranking...not much between those 4. All knocked fighters out consistently, all had KO wins vs some very solid competition at the very top of the division.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    There are plenty to consider, but I'd say Prime Tyson is no lower than Top 5. I would put Louis, Marciano, and Foreman at or around the same ranking...not much between those 4.
    What's the logic for ranking Foreman above Tyson? He had godlike power in his fists, but his technique was awful, he was very slow and inaccurate with his punching. He was just fortunate enough to have two wrecking balls in his fists and destroyed whatever they managed to land on.

    I think Louis and Marciano are great names to consider, but I think Tyson's superior speed and power would put him over the top of those guys.

  9. #9
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    George Foreman had poor technique to start with, but 68 KO's out of 76 wins shows how long he carried his power and how good he was at finishing a fight.

    Foreman 89.47% KO rate
    Tyson 88% KO rate

    They're closer than you want to give Foreman credit for.


    And just for shits and giggles

    Louis 78.7% (lower than I expected honestly)
    Marciano 87.7%
    Vitali 91.11%
    Wlad 83.6%
    Shavers 91.89%
    Lyle 72%
    Dempsey 77.27% (lower than I expected again)

    So there are the actual KO percentages

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1113
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    He may have better way to delver the punch but hell Foreman as slow as he was fucking put people way just by tapping them. I think Foreman's gifts make him better heavyweight puncher because he didn't even have to land to well or through fast to knock you out. Also Tyson when faced with a great fighter in Holyfeild i don't think he mange to hurt Holyfeild as much as Foreman did and that man was like 40 i think maybe older not sure exact age so i don't have a problem with Foreman being better puncher or rated higher because he didn't need technique and he was able knock people out in his late 40's.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,318
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    George Foreman had poor technique to start with, but 68 KO's out of 76 wins shows how long he carried his power and how good he was at finishing a fight.

    Foreman 89.47% KO rate
    Tyson 88% KO rate

    They're closer than you want to give Foreman credit for.


    And just for shits and giggles

    Louis 78.7% (lower than I expected honestly)
    Marciano 87.7%
    Vitali 91.11%
    Wlad 83.6%
    Shavers 91.89%
    Lyle 72%
    Dempsey 77.27% (lower than I expected again)

    So there are the actual KO percentages
    You missed out the great Bruno from your list.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    George Foreman had poor technique to start with, but 68 KO's out of 76 wins shows how long he carried his power and how good he was at finishing a fight.

    Foreman 89.47% KO rate
    Tyson 88% KO rate

    They're closer than you want to give Foreman credit for.


    And just for shits and giggles

    Louis 78.7% (lower than I expected honestly)
    Marciano 87.7%
    Vitali 91.11%
    Wlad 83.6%
    Shavers 91.89%
    Lyle 72%
    Dempsey 77.27% (lower than I expected again)

    So there are the actual KO percentages
    I'm not really interested in KO percentage because it isn't really relevant to who was the better puncher because there are a ton of other factors that enter into a guy's KO percentage as well.

    I'm talking about the whole package, not necessarily who hits the hardest, who had their power the longest, who knocked out more guys, ect.

    We all know Tyson, Foreman, Marciano, Dempsey, Shavers, Louis, ect were great KO artists. But watching them and examining everything: technique, speed, power, combination ability, the variety of punches used effectively, ect, who could possibly be a better "puncher" than Tyson?

    There are guys in that list that no doubt trump in in certain aspects (Foreman probably trumps him in pure power), but when added all up who has a better combinaton of all those factors than Tyson?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    3,409
    Mentioned
    61 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    802
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    He's in my top 3 because of his delivery of punch, and all aspects together.

    But in terms of pure power alone, it's close between a lot of fighters.
    Agreed 100%. In terms of pure power, I think there are probably a bunch of guys that trump Tyson. Guys like Foreman and Shavers had more pure power than him I'd be willing to bet.

    If we're talking about the overall force of the punch, I'd say Tyson's speed and technique probably leveled it out though.

    But who are your other top 3 punchers, or specifically the ones you would rate above Tyson at HW?
    Honestly I'd say Foreman and Shavers, but there's some others like Bruno, Briggs, etc, but those guys are just power really.

    I don't rate Marciano up there based on his era of very small heavyweights, granted he could bang but what would really have done against a Wlad Klitschko?
    You say tomato,
    ‘n I say …… it correctly.

  14. #14
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    I don't rate Marciano up there based on his era of very small heavyweights, granted he could bang but what would really have done against a Wlad Klitschko?
    It's not a matter of how he'd do vs today's heavyweights it's about the power he had and man did he ever have it. Not only that he had some MASSIVE KO's late in fights where he'd plant a punch square on his opponent's jaw and put them to sleep.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,318
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: How is Tyson not the greatest heavyweight puncher?

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    I don't rate Marciano up there based on his era of very small heavyweights, granted he could bang but what would really have done against a Wlad Klitschko?
    It's not a matter of how he'd do vs today's heavyweights it's about the power he had and man did he ever have it. Not only that he had some MASSIVE KO's late in fights where he'd plant a punch square on his opponent's jaw and put them to sleep.
    Agreed, Wlad gets late knock outs but they are generally down to battering the opponent until they have very little to fight back with.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 73
    Last Post: 03-31-2009, 04:10 PM
  2. Replies: 52
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 02:34 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 07:53 PM
  4. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-13-2007, 12:47 PM
  5. Who is The Greatest Heavyweight Puncher of All-Time?
    By NorthSideX4 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 07-14-2005, 05:02 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing