Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post

In the end, it has to be Maidana. I know he's beaten Maidana's style tons of times before, but at least Maidana is ranked at WW (unlike Khan who's never even fought at 147).
Even though Khan has already beat Maidana?

Is Maidana rated simply becuase he beat Bronner? Isn't Bronner just a bit overrated?

Didn't a fat Morales nearly beat Maidana?

Seriously
There is that arguement.

Then theres the arguement of:-

1. Khan has never fought at 147
2. Khan has lost two of his biggest fights at 140.
3. Khans last wins were against lightweights
4. Khan nearly lost in last fight to a past prime by 8 yrs lightweight.
5. Khan hasnt fought for ten months
6. Khan is a spoilt brat.
7. Khan has never avenged his losses.
1. Maidana hasnt done well at 147.
2. Maidana lost 2 of his biggest fights at 140 including to Khan
3. If u want to call Diaz a lightweight, then Maidana's last win was against a Super-Feather
4. Maidana bearly beat Morales who is about 10 years past his prime
5. Maidana has never avenged his losses
Maidana has slightly improved though..
Cant change khan.
Perhaps khan should be fighting maidana in may.