Keeping the pound is the worst thing they could do? Model their finances on Iceland? Tyranny of the UK? Do you know how ridiculous the things that you've said are?![]()
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Keeping the pound is the worst thing they could do? Model their finances on Iceland? Tyranny of the UK? Do you know how ridiculous the things that you've said are?![]()
Excuse my spelling Hidden Content
Array
They need to keep the pound so they have a central bank who can bail out Lloyds and RBS the next time they have huge losses. Both are HQd in Scotland. If they're part of the euro there's no bailout and Scotland makes Greece look like Monte Carlo, the whole country in crushing debt for over half a century as a best case scenario.
It's all irrelevant anyway. The yes campaign would need to be currently running at 60% support as people will peel off from fear of the unknown as the vote gets closer. Barring some miracle Scotland says no to independence by a decent margin.
Array
Royal Bank of Scotland has already said they would stay in England, so they can stay. Then the other one can just go broke or stay too if they like. England hates its own people, but will very happily bail out corporations that they like.
Scotland should throw out the trash and do things properly. They should show how a system should work, rather than copy the methods of the most corrupt financial sectors in the world.
I want to see models with alternatives that can show people how a system should be run. It would also show the English people how abused they have been and in turn might well inspire them.
Scottish independence could be a great thing for the region. Instead of sinking with it all, Scotland can shine a beam of light and say 'This is a country of the people for the people'. A lot of other nations have totally forgotten about representing the people.
Array
Array
The banks should have gone bust to begin with. It would have been catastrophic, but I think that should have happened. It was like a person that had grown a massive cyst on its head the size of a balloon. Realistically it should have been burst and operated on as it was kind of nasty. Instead the cyst is now the size of an entire village. I still think that morality means you admit you made a mistake and do something about the cyst. It will be even more painful, but do something as it looks and is hideous.
Array
You can let the bank shareholders lose their money and sack and imprison the top execuatives but you have to guarantee the debts of any major bank or the entire system goes down and it destroys the real economy, we're talking situations far worse then Greece (Greece currently has 30% unemployment, debt compound trap etc etc) in every major country. Much cheaper to bail the baks out.
Regulate them afterwards by all means to prevent them doing it again and put bankers who break the rules in jail but impossible to let a big bank go bust.
Array
The banks should have been allowed to fail several years ago. From this point on a bankrupt Britain is going to be held at gunpoint and the city of London with its legal team and Bank of England phantom money supply is going to carry on with what can only be described as rampant criminality.
My description of the massive cyst is apt because banks haven't changed. They are still insolvent and in turn the government is utterly broke. It would have been better to treat the cyst early and suffer the real pain as the moral hazard is now going to be kept on the books permanently and the UK is functioning as a protector of elite criminals and the rest of society has to pay for it on an almost permanent basis through financial repression. The average high street is a choice of bookie, pay day lender, or bank. Basically take a chance, tide me over, or financially repress me.
The Mt Gox situation is a good example of how to deal with a messy situation. You let the company go broke, some bitcoin is lost, the market goes down because of uncertainty, but in the long run every thing is clean as the bad apple is thrown away. The banking sector has done the opposite. The bad apples were reimbursed for their theft, are still getting filthy rich, and they print more of an ever debased and untrusted currency. The suffering and pain is temporary with Mt Gox and Bitcoin, it is permanent with the mafia Bank of England, The Tories, and the insolvent, fraudulent banks.
Array
Scots should be grateful to England.
They prospered in all the British colonies and Scottish businessmen thrived as part of the British empire.
Before union, Scotland tried to have it's own colony, Nova Scotia, but France took it away rather easily.
Without Scotland, England would have still done very well and had her empire. But without England, Scotland would have been a much less significant country like Latvia.
Array
But this is here today. Britain is a shell of a nation that starves cancer victims. Scotland needs to do the right thing and erase the real cancer.
There is not a single argument that can be made to suggest Scotland should stay in the City of Corruption. Of course it shouldn't and we should wish them well and stop scaring them.
The monarchy on the other hand should fear, as we really don't like them. Gay Will, nah, don't believe you.
Array
Is this guy scotish?
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=773755669351872
Array
He has the teeth to be Scottish. .
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Array
Array
Array
None of those things are ridiculous. Open your eyes and see what is going in the UK.
a) The UK is bankrupt. The pound isn't worth the digits they use on a computer screen to print it. It has gone to zombie fraudulent banks and if it ever reaches the street you have hyper inflation. You all have the debt both personal and national. It is a mess and Scotland doesn't need to be associating with that.
b) Iceland said no to giving up their nation to international bankers, Britain does the opposite keeping its citizens poorer through financial repression.
c) Tyranny for sure (undemocratic, police state, austerity for only the poor, unchecked immigration, subservient press, stopping people at airports, economic slavery via repression etc).
I have explained my points and it is for you to tell me why I am wrong. Nothing I have said is ridiculous, but I admit it might seem strange to anyone who simply reads the papers. That's another problem with the UK, they don't tell people the truth.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks