9-11...after all this time do you really think it was terrorists?

[mrbig1]

Has anyone ever saw a building come straight down? Building 7 wasn't hit but it came straight down as well. Only demolition buildings come straight down. I don't care what people say. I have eyes of my own and can think for myself.

No, no you can't. You, like me and everyone else in this thread, in all likelyhood have no credibility on this subject and a woefully inadequate level of information and understanding to form any kind of opinion. You're merely parroting "facts" that you heard from people you think would know. Which is fine: nobody has the time to know a fuckload about every topic so we have to rely on "experts" to fill in the blanks on a lot of things. But don't act like you're this "free thinker": these aren't your opinions, you just chose a side and are towing the line. Unless of course you can tell me you're an authority on demolition, physics, whatever.

This isn't an open and shut fact - there are "experts" on each side of the fence, some saying it could happen and others saying it's impossible. The fact is, very few of these "experts" have really that much credibility on the subject: the fact that you're a physics major or you've been on a demolition crew all your life knocking down old decrepit buildings gives you the authority to say, without any doubt, what is and isn't possible when a passenger airplane full of jet fuel is flown into two of the biggest, busiest, heaviest buildings in the world? How many scientific studies have been done on airplanes flying into skyscrapers? It's an insane scenario with a BILLION different variables and moving parts in the equation (unlike a regular demolition which, as the name states, is a very controlled operation).

Lets say for the sake of argument, 100% of the "experts" agree that this is highly unlikely: you then have to factor in "adnormality" factor: the fact that "freak" occurances happen every day that defy explanation, odds and/or logic. Scientific opinion varies and changes so often, it would be far from definitive proof.

Also, it ignores a basic logical question: why would the government, having just pulled off the greatest conspiracy in the history of conspiracies (one that involved HUNDREDS of people in the know and not objecting to killing thousands of innocent Americans, sneaking TONS of explosives into the busiest buildings in the world and installing it without anyone noticing, hijacking planes, ect ect), decide to perform a perfect, "by the book" demolition of the WTC? Demolitions are designed, planned and timed out perfectly to cause the building to collapse on itself and not spill out. Why not set the explosives off at random times or put them in atypical places so that the building would topple over completely? Would that be just as easy (actually, much easier) than performing a controlled demolition?

Why would they, having pulled off this genius conspiracy, choose to do a perfect controlled demolition that would no doubt make people suspicious and give people "cause" to look into whether or not it was an inside job?

I will give you that. I don't know it for sure. I just have questions that have never been answered. How did building 7 come down? It wasn't even hit. In America if you question the Government you're some kind of nut. So it better to be a good little slave and say nothing.