Some on other forums keep using Paulie as an example of why Khan beats Broner. They fight noting alike and the only thing Khan matches Paulie with speed wise is hand. He does not move anything like Paulie and I've never seen him crouch in his career. He also has nowhere near the footwork. Khan beating Paulie has nothing to do with his chances either. It was Paulies rubberband man style in fast forward that gave Broner issues. And even with that movement had Paulie not had his chin he may have been stopped. Hell, Gavins speedy Gonzalez routine gave Broner issues. Khans a statue in comparison. He walks or jumps straight in and straight with his chin in the air and steps straight back in the same position with his lead hand down.If Broner cant beat Khan then he's in the wrong business. Losing once to a guy you should have beat has been happening in this sport for over a hundred years. No way does he lose to Khan. There is a reason Haymon arranged this from the start. The whole poll thing was a rouse.

Ironically Khan would do better against Floyd then he will against Broner.