Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,012
    Mentioned
    64 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    670
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Honestly in the 130's is where Broner should be boxing at this stage. It was remarkable he stepped up 2 weight classes to begin with but he should have stepped right back down to where he can whack guys around for awhile. Far too much talent in the 140's.
    "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"

    Lennox Lewis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,334
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Broner is a fat fuck. I mean that just has to be understood, There is zero-zip-natta chance he will "drop" back to 135. He weighed 148 with Escobedo and walks around at 160-180 by the looks of him in down time. The weights are becoming smoke n' mirrors and he is one of the poser poster boys for it.
    I def don't think Khan will happen because frankly...Khan has -one- last hoorah and a poss loss..why in the fook will he jump through hoops vs a guy who fell like a exposed rusty anchor with his still high draw power back home etc. If he does this dog & pony show with hopes of Mayweather..again..he needs to have his head checked and a restraining order taken out against him.

    Now we have Collazo calling out Khan After signing with Haymon. Collazo needs to watch his back, Haymon is just using him as a decoy cause he would whip Broners ass if you ask me

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    714
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    i just think that they dont want to throw him back in there with a dangerous opponent right away. i think that going down to 140 and fighting an easier fight is alright. the main problem though is that the culture of boxing ruins these types of fights. fighters fight so few times throughout the year that we want them to take big fights everytime but if they fought 5-6 times a year then having an easy fight here and there wouldnt seem so bad.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1015
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Anyone think that russian hooker in those drag photos used a strap-on to f*<k Oscar up the @$$ ?

    Some freaky $#!t was definitely goin' on there with a fishnets Oscar out of his mind on alcohol and cocaine, and a hundred to one says she probably boinked him!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    392 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    The jump up in weight seemed daft, a move up to 140 to test the water would have been the
    way to go.! But money a bit ego and mouth go hand in hand, most people enjoyed him taking
    a panning myself included,.
    Broner crashed and burned and frankly could not happen to a nicer guy,, who ever
    he fights I feel his opponent will give him a battle, as his air of invincibility as gone down
    the pan with the shit he talks.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    814
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    i just think that they dont want to throw him back in there with a dangerous opponent right away. i think that going down to 140 and fighting an easier fight is alright. the main problem though is that the culture of boxing ruins these types of fights. fighters fight so few times throughout the year that we want them to take big fights everytime but if they fought 5-6 times a year then having an easy fight here and there wouldnt seem so bad.
    I agree.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Steve Kim on MaxBoxing made a good point with regard to Al Haymon: he's great for his fighters, not great for boxing fans.

    Look at Kid Chocolate. He fought a tough fight against Rosado in October 2013. Now's he fighting an older junior middleweight when he has Curtis Stevens and Macklin calling him out.

    With respect to Broner, I agree with Finito, he took a tough loss, and they should spend some time rebuilding him. Khan is too dangerous an opponent right now. As for Khan, he deserves better than Collazo if he was in the running for Mayweather and Broner. In terms of money, Collazo doesn't bring the same level to the table as other guys in their stable do.

    And Stevenson? Signs with Haymon and now it appears is moving away from facing Kovalev.

    It's not just Haymon though. Look at Canelo. Lara is the logical fight for him next. He beat Angulo, who Canelo is fighting now. Canelo-Angulo makes sense (maybe not on PPV though), but Lara should be next. Yet, Shaeffer is already talking about matching Lara with the Molina/Charlo winner.

    That's why we need to embrace it in a way when someone goes for greatness when they don't have to. Like Loma taking on Salido in his second (or 7th) pro fight or Cotto fighting Martinez.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1030
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    It's not just Haymon though
    True it most certainly isn't. Its systemic. The business of boxing is now what its about not the boxing. Its like a black hole or close to it with less and less light escaping.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    That's why we need to embrace it in a way when someone goes for greatness when they don't have to. Like Loma taking on Salido in his second (or 7th) pro fight or Cotto fighting Martinez.
    Nail on the head right there.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,155
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    They're just trying to carefully build both guys back up where they can take part in big fights again. Khan if carefully matched can maybe be a Floyd opponent in the future and they're hoping for more than one big fight from Broner. But obviously matching them together is going to knock one of them out of the picture so they're not doing it. Broner is supposed to be fighting some lightweight next at 140 and Khan is going to be matched with a relatively credible welter they think he can beat, possibly Collazo.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1030
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Broner is a fat fuck. I mean that just has to be understood, There is zero-zip-natta chance he will "drop" back to 135. He weighed 148 with Escobedo and walks around at 160-180 by the looks of him in down time. The weights are becoming smoke n' mirrors and he is one of the poser poster boys for it.
    I def don't think Khan will happen because frankly...Khan has -one- last hoorah and a poss loss..why in the fook will he jump through hoops vs a guy who fell like a exposed rusty anchor with his still high draw power back home etc. If he does this dog & pony show with hopes of Mayweather..again..he needs to have his head checked and a restraining order taken out against him.

    Now we have Collazo calling out Khan After signing with Haymon. Collazo needs to watch his back, Haymon is just using him as a decoy cause he would whip Broners ass if you ask me

    Indeed. Just say he's going back down and leave it at that. The explanation they give makes a quacking noise. Now it may not be Broner but that's part of the problem to. Being led around on a leash because some pimp considers you the equivalent of a living rrsp. Its more mediocrity being shoved down our throats.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1015
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: GBP=Golden Boy Protectionism?

    Its more mediocrity being shoved down our throats.
    There's worse things to be shoved down one's throat!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. 175's Golden Age
    By marbleheadmaui in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-10-2011, 01:12 AM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-18-2011, 04:34 PM
  3. Golden Boy
    By 0james0 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-09-2010, 08:17 PM
  4. golden gloves
    By landscaper43 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-14-2009, 02:13 PM
  5. Golden gloves....
    By hollo3255 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 12:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Saddo Boxing - Boxing