Re: Is this the worst era in HW boxing history?
		
		
				
				
		
			
				
					Mr140 I have to disagree with the whole thread really.
What exactly is your criteria for saying this is a shit HW era?
Because for a books worth of reasons this era is definitely better than virtually all others in any aspects like talent of the fighters involved or their h2h capabilities against them.
The 70's was a really weak era, no doubt. At the time of Frazier vs Ali, the crowd BOOED Ali for a stinker of a fight! Now it's regarded as the FOTC! Ha!
The 80's was considered a very weak era early on with Holmes, Witherspoon, Smith shining bright but nothing really special, Later that decade was boosted by Mike Tyson who saved it somewhat.
Sure, the 90's was probably the best era but your perception of Vitali v s Lewis is way different than mine. Vitali did retire Lewis, and he went on to carry the flag for some further dominant and prominent beatdowns of dangerous 00's fighters.
I feel the 00 era was of comparable calibre to the 90's, the only difference imo is that a lot of the fighters involved and the dominant forces in it were NOT American or even British.
				
			 
			
		 
			
    
            
            
                "Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
                        
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks