Prime Pernell Whitaker in today's era.

[jehoshaphat]

Even the most scandelous gangster I know and even the biggest criminal have soft spots for their mothers.. men are good to their mothers and that's the fuckin man code.. this POS junky evicted his mother from her own home? Fuck him I dont give a shit if he was a great fighter , he was probably coked up in some of his fights and that's cheating anyways.

http://m.youtube.com/results?q=perne...%20mother&sm=1

Yeah, I'm sure you read the entire story and both sides. I heard Kellerman go over the story and at first he thought the same as anybody would initially. But he said there really wasn't a choice because Whitaker is broke and many people lived in the house and nobody paid anything on the mortgage or the taxes and that it was going to foreclosure if he didn't sell it and plus he owed a lot in back taxes. And Kellerman also stated that Whitaker also tried to get them to just pay the taxes on the home but to no avail. So his choices were sell the home or lose it and no one gets anything.
Meanwhile...the thread is about how Sweet P would fair against today's era. And as far as cheating you can't be serious. Dude you support Margarito and try every excuse to cover up arguably the worst cheating attempt in boxing history. Everybody is or probably did cheat except the man who got caught outright attempting to fight with bricks. Okay, gotcha.

[Max Power]

"Everyone is cheating except for the guy attempting to fight with bricks"

That was pretty funny Finito LOL

Well anyway he's a great fighter and would do well today.

I just wouldn't bet on him personally against the better fighters of the present and recent eras.

Got nothing else really to add here.

[Right Handed Southpaw]

I just wouldn't bet on him personally against the better fighters of the present and recent eras.

Then its pretty obvious you never seen the guy.

[Max Power]

I just wouldn't bet on him personally against the better fighters of the present and recent eras.

Then its pretty obvious you never seen the guy.

No it just means I'm taking into account his lack of offensive traits as well as his escapology.

Honestly I think ppl like you tend to overrate him a bit. He is not near the level of Mayweather.

[Master]

I just wouldn't bet on him personally against the better fighters of the present and recent eras.

Then its pretty obvious you never seen the guy.

No it just means I'm taking into account his lack of offensive traits as well as his escapology.

Honestly I think ppl like you tend to overrate him a bit. He is not near the level of Mayweather.

Max you are taking the piss or you are clueless, which is it?

[Max Power]

I might revise it down to just this.

I don't think Sweet Pea is near the same level as Mayweather. That is all.

I don't wanna degrade a fighter like Pea I actually like just for arguments sake so that is all.

[Beanflicker]

I might revise it down to just this.

I don't think Sweet Pea is near the same level as Mayweather. That is all.

I don't wanna degrade a fighter like Pea I actually like just for arguments sake so that is all.

I agree that Mayweather is a superior fighter to Sweet Pea.

I would argue that Pea is at least NEAR the same level as Mayweather, but that's just semantics so whatever.