" Pac and Bradley fought like amateurs " says Mayweather

[Beanflicker]

Why would Floyd fight Bradley, Bradley is damaged goods now after getting spanked by Pac (just like Pac was damaged goods after getting spanked by JMM lol)

[FinitoElDinamita]

Im not a fan of floyd but it's hard to disagree with what he said and he has the right to criticize any fighter..

Pac and bradley would look like worse amateurs if they fought floyd..

Sidenote: the current pacman

[Master]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

[Beanflicker]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

A turtle who's beat the hell out of a lot of fast dudes.

[Master]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

A turtle who's beat the hell out of a lot of fast dudes.

Except Devon Alexander and Amir Khan.

[InTheNeutralCorner]

I agree with pretty much everything he said, but I think he's being a little hard on Pac. Pac fought a smart fight and got the W against a highly ranked/regarded undefeated champion.

But he's 100% right about Bradley, he fought like an amateur and gassed himself early.

And he's right that Pac doesn't have the same pop in his punches anymore.

Pac may not have the same pop but Floyd still does not have the balls.

If he thinks Pac is there for the picking then fight him to shut most of the critics up. Whatever Floyd wants, Floyd gets. And this fight he can get if he wants it. I don't believe Pac will come up with that "afraid of needles" excuse again.

[Addicted to_boxing]

Im not a fan of floyd but it's hard to disagree with what he said and he has the right to criticize any fighter..

Pac and bradley would look like worse amateurs if they fought floyd..

Sidenote: the current pacman

I never thought about it but in watching the fight again I am further convinced Pac has no business talking about fighting Mayweather. He has fought two cupcakes with little to no power since getting KTFO . Bradley's big head is the only thing that stepped into the ring that night. He had no fight plan to go with his paltry AA battery power . Not certain Pac can even handle Maidana, Mathysse, Porter , Garcia or Thurman. How does wins over these last two light hitting opponents catapult him in to the "Money" sweepstakes? He needs to prove himself again not earn a huge payday with a built in fought a naturally bigger guy excuse.

[FinitoElDinamita]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

That's true but are you saying that Canelo was a cherrypick?

Bernard hopkins is an obvious cherrypicker. Floyd mayweather has been in many fights on even terms.

[Master]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

That's true but are you saying that Canelo was a cherrypick?

Bernard hopkins is an obvious cherrypicker. Floyd mayweather has been in many fights on even terms.

No that was a very good victory but I am on about Maidana and Guerrero.

[FinitoElDinamita]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

That's true but are you saying that Canelo was a cherrypick?

Bernard hopkins is an obvious cherrypicker. Floyd mayweather has been in many fights on even terms.

No that was a very good victory but I am on about Maidana and Guerrero.

Do you view floyd-guerrero as less of a matchup than Pac-Mosley?

[Master]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

That's true but are you saying that Canelo was a cherrypick?

Bernard hopkins is an obvious cherrypicker. Floyd mayweather has been in many fights on even terms.

No that was a very good victory but I am on about Maidana and Guerrero.

Do you view floyd-guerrero as less of a matchup than Pac-Mosley?

No same crap level fight. Floyd v Maidana should not even be PPV should be on ESPN.

[chris6878]

Well at least they fought one another in an evenly matched contest and is better than choosing a slow turtle of an opponent who we have no interest in watching.

That's true but are you saying that Canelo was a cherrypick?

Bernard hopkins is an obvious cherrypicker. Floyd mayweather has been in many fights on even terms.

No that was a very good victory but I am on about Maidana and Guerrero.

Do you view floyd-guerrero as less of a matchup than Pac-Mosley?

No same crap level fight. Floyd v Maidana should not even be PPV should be on ESPN.

naw put it on nbc

[ykdadamaja]

At least they fought each other. Twice

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhh...........................

[KananKrus]

Im not a fan of floyd but it's hard to disagree with what he said and he has the right to criticize any fighter..

Pac and bradley would look like worse amateurs if they fought floyd..

Sidenote: the current pacman

I never thought about it but in watching the fight again I am further convinced Pac has no business talking about fighting Mayweather. He has fought two cupcakes with little to no power since getting KTFO . Bradley's big head is the only thing that stepped into the ring that night. He had no fight plan to go with his paltry AA battery power . Not certain Pac can even handle Maidana, Mathysse, Porter , Garcia or Thurman. How does wins over these last two light hitting opponents catapult him in to the "Money" sweepstakes? He needs to prove himself again not earn a huge payday with a built in fought a naturally bigger guy excuse.

You sure are very objective... I'm certain your views are the yardstick to what makes fit for sensitive and high impact issues...

Nevertheless, the Queen is mistaken and her disciples are led to misinformation!

[Addicted to_boxing]

Im not a fan of floyd but it's hard to disagree with what he said and he has the right to criticize any fighter..

Pac and bradley would look like worse amateurs if they fought floyd..

Sidenote: the current pacman

I never thought about it but in watching the fight again I am further convinced Pac has no business talking about fighting Mayweather. He has fought two cupcakes with little to no power since getting KTFO . Bradley's big head is the only thing that stepped into the ring that night. He had no fight plan to go with his paltry AA battery power . Not certain Pac can even handle Maidana, Mathysse, Porter , Garcia or Thurman. How does wins over these last two light hitting opponents catapult him in to the "Money" sweepstakes? He needs to prove himself again not earn a huge payday with a built in fought a naturally bigger guy excuse.

You sure are very objective... I'm certain your views are the yardstick to what makes fit for sensitive and high impact issues...

Nevertheless, the Queen is mistaken and her disciples are led to misinformation!

What is your point ? All people in here are objective ... roll up all that british rhetoric and smoke it or shove it up your arse. Find a worthy Brit fighter to follow. Oh, wait the Queen and all her brethren seem to be unable to breed a real Boxing champion.