SugarJ's World Boxing Rankings

[Lineal]

Light welter will look good when Broner fights there.

Broner should almost certainly get rated at 140 unless he looks awful or loses. I feel bad that Molina's herculean effort didn't get him rated but guys like Soto, Lundy and Perez all rank arguably ahead.

Belmontes was also unlucky not to enter at lightweight. The fight with Figueroa was close enough to go either way. But I did not think it was a robbery.

I am actually excited to see both Molina and Belmontes' next performances.

[Mark TKO]

a good job sir

Feedback

- the weight is missing off middleweight
- going to do a pound for pound ?
- stick to the same format for each category eg pic of champ and ratings below
- make it easier to elect the different weight categories eg so use doesn't have to scroll down the left pane
- is Amir Khan anywhere in there ?!? Couldnt see him


Sory if seems being picky but I do this a lot in my job

[Master]

a good job sir

Feedback

- the weight is missing off middleweight
- going to do a pound for pound ?
- stick to the same format for each category eg pic of champ and ratings below
- make it easier to elect the different weight categories eg so use doesn't have to scroll down the left pane
- is Amir Khan anywhere in there ?!? Couldnt see him


Sory if seems being picky but I do this a lot in my job

So you are a cunt at work too?

[Mark TKO]

a good job sir

Feedback

- the weight is missing off middleweight
- going to do a pound for pound ?
- stick to the same format for each category eg pic of champ and ratings below
- make it easier to elect the different weight categories eg so use doesn't have to scroll down the left pane
- is Amir Khan anywhere in there ?!? Couldnt see him


Sory if seems being picky but I do this a lot in my job

So you are a cunt at work too?

complete

[Lineal]

a good job sir

Feedback

- the weight is missing off middleweight
- going to do a pound for pound ?
- stick to the same format for each category eg pic of champ and ratings below
- make it easier to elect the different weight categories eg so use doesn't have to scroll down the left pane
- is Amir Khan anywhere in there ?!? Couldnt see him

Sory if seems being picky but I do this a lot in my job

Thank so much for the feedback, I really appreciate that you took the time to have a look and comment.

I have changed the look a bit since I first started so have been updating the weights as changes were made, so that's why some still have the old format with no weight limits listed. I will get there.

Master asked about P4P when I first posted on here. I personally don't like P4P lists as they are too subjective and opinions can sway and vary so easily depending on a who likes what fighter. I would be happy for any of you guys to post your P4P lists, I just prefer divisional ratings as a fighters accomplishments are a big part of rating a fighter.

In your third point do you mean keep things the same? Or post the pic of the champ into the full current ratings update?

Sorry about being able to select the weight catagories. I hadn't noticed, on my screen I can see all the weights on the sidebar and thought that would be easier to pick a weight to view, rather than a drop down menu. But I will have a play around and see what I can do. In saying that word press is very limited in what you can do before they start charging to add features.

Amir Khan was removed from the 140 ratings as he was inactive for over a year and his fight this weekend is scheduled at welter. A good performance against Collazo could see him rated at 147 with Broner moving out and into 140.

Thanks again

[Mark TKO]

no problem mate

third point I mean keep same format. Some weight divisions you have the pic of the no 1 rated fighter and top ten underneath. Others you just have the top ten and no photo.

Keep the same format eg photo and top ten list. Also keep the photo same size and ratings box same size and screen position etc so it flows easy on eye and doesn't jump around as you flick between weights. Make sense ?

[Lineal]

no problem mate

third point I mean keep same format. Some weight divisions you have the pic of the no 1 rated fighter and top ten underneath. Others you just have the top ten and no photo.

Keep the same format eg photo and top ten list. Also keep the photo same size and ratings box same size and screen position etc so it flows easy on eye and doesn't jump around as you flick between weights. Make sense ?

I have made some changes to the blog, hopefully it works better. I am still new to this and am really learning as I go. I really appreciate the feedback and support from you knowledgeable boxing guys.

I only have a picture of the champion in the division where one is recognised, so if there is now champ the division doesn't have a photo. Keeping the photo's the same size has been difficult but I will try my best.

Thanks again.

I have updated the ratings:

Sugar's World Boxing Rankings | Legitimate unbiased ratings

[Master]

For the record Mark TKO is not a knowledgeable boxing poster he is a casual and superficial fan.

Where are the round card girls and their photos.

[Mark TKO]

For the record Mark TKO is not a knowledgeable boxing poster he is a casual and superficial fan.

Where are the round card girls and their photos.

Keep talking son. Keep talking