
Originally Posted by
Silkeyjoe
Ross' usual pathetic arguments about number I losses blah blah blah. Macklin and Stevens at middle are as good as any of Kesslers recent wins.
Wlads lost a couple of times so I guess all the unbeaten heavyweights are far better then him and having one of them on ur rec is much better then beating Wlad.
Ross a clown with biased views and can't judge fighters rationally at all.
Pathetic arguments?
Kesslers opponents are far better than what Golovkin has faced. Kesslers win over Magee is better than Golovkins over Macklin!
Magees losses have all come against world class fighters!
Like I said, when Magee is at least equal to every opponent you have faced, it shows the level you have not yet reached. Kesslers.
Bookmarks