Does Wlad need a loss?

**erics44** · 05-16-2014 08:50 AM

Originally Posted by Master

Wlad will be appreciated after he has retired, a bit like Lennox and Calzaghe are today.

You do not miss something until it is gone. Wlad has endeavoured to unify all the belts, consistently fought the best fighters out there and handled himself well outside of the ring. For that he should retire undefeated.

i dont agree, when he goes we will start getting good HW title fights again

and a lot of fans who are now saying it would be worse without him would will then be saying - flippin nora, we have a HW division again

therell be heavyweight title fights on and people will be buying beers and inviting their mates round, people will be talking about it at work, pubs will be staying open late for it

none of that shit happens now coz the champion is boring as fuck inside and outside of the ring and he is allowed to cheat in the most boring way

**johnsebastianmiran** · 05-16-2014 08:38 PM

I really hate talking politics but our so calld hero is getting me to the pont where I only watch a heavyweight fight if he is not in it. As far as I am concerned there are other divisions bu these Alphabet soup comissions are at fault and they hold fans hostage. We pay for all this but we don't get respect. Wlad doesn' need a loss, he needs to fight the number one contenders and forget the other pretenders. This can also be alluded to the fact that he is about as active as a person in a coma. It's time for a true champion which he may be capable of or stepping down and not insulting us by fighting retreads. Respectfully speaking to my fellow fans, alphabet soup isn't nourishing and for the B.S. fights the Klitsko brothers force us to watch while they are partially at fault for hand picking these boring opponents, the names WBO, WBA, WBC and IBF should ring a familiar note.