King Arthur and his knights vs Mongolians

[Hulk]

Being real and not fictitious would seem to suggest the God damn Mongolians (always breaking down my wall). Having never existed though ,King Arthur and his Knights would be immortal and impossible to kill ? Tricky one.

I used to take my son and his mate to Tintagel, not far from where I live, to play knights with their wooden swords, but although there are the remains of a castle there is no trace of King Arthur or his Knights. The legend though helped sustain the British through the dark ages and may have helped instil that gung ho, fuck everyone invading us again and again, lets take over the world spirit that led to an Empire.

Hahaha good South Park reference.

Yes King Arthur is a work of fiction and if a King Arthur ever did exsist he wasn't very memorable as he amounts to a blurb in the history books.

[Gandalf]

I agree with Greenbeanz. It is hard to reconcile fiction with reality and on that basis even a basic paper clip would likely annihilate the phantom Arthur and his Knights. The Mongolians are many and real and the paper clip would have little chance.

[Andre]

Knight Templar verses the Mongolians better match up.

In the snow Id go for these guys with their long spears and bows.

One on one on foot the Knight.

[Master]

I have always been amazed about the size of Mongolia and right next to China who would normally invade it. The Mongolians must have scared them to never ever try and make it another one of their province.