If you have a losing record, you don't belong in the ring with a world champion. If you have under 15 fights, you don't belong in there with a world champ that has over 100. That's as true now as it was in 1930.
By that logic Rigo should have never been in there with anyone he has fought as a pro along with all the other boxers that got title shots in quick fashion. Fighters have actually debuted in title fights. In addition again, if you fight once a week or once a month you are going to have a losing record. When you fight once a year you might bring a winning record. What makes Pep a phenom is that he did both. I remember you jumped all over Greb because he fought 45 times in one year and never lost.
Lets pull 45 guys off the street and have Floyd fight them in one year and see what happens.

When it's old timers, we give a 80/20 split in focus/importance to quantity. When it's modern fighters, we give the 80/20 split in focus/importance to quality.
Look in the mirror though. Anytime any past great is brought up, the first thing you attempt to do is ridicule and belittle them. We are comparing different eras that are and were different how else are we to compare? I'm sure military men compare battlefields of the past with today's and in some cases copy the past like the Yanks copying Rommel in the Iraqi desert. You discount past greats because there is no video well when Ray Robinson says Pep was the best pure boxer he'd ever seen I have a tendency to believe him.

Btw I think Sanchez rips Peps head off and Arguello would also but that does not take away from the mans greatness.