Well.. from one decision I can't say yes or no, but Checking boxrec, she has a history of these kind of decisions. Scoring the fights closer than the other 2 judges in most of her fights. With the benefit of her husband's experience, she should definitely not be making these kind of gaffes.

Good Read on Chuck:Judge Emeritus Chuck Giampa: You can't have robots deciding who wins fights - National Boxing | Examiner.com

One thing I will say is it seems more and more common now for that one judge to go the other way, when you have a tough exciting fight. I dont know if: a.)they're paid for their vote and follow through no matter what the result so they can be approached again on another fight. b.)Are trying to keep the young names alive for the future of boxing or c.) trying to keep a shred of doubt there to justify rematch possibilities. Its probably none of the three or it could be all of the 3.

The more common explanation. She bit on the flashy shoe-shining by Russell, which had my thinking my TV was off or something when he exhaled like 6 times and threw 3 punches in those flurries.