WBA,WBC,IBF agree

[ykdadamaja]

Most likely country-specific athletics boards, and most powerful the USA Athletics board and congress, has asked them to think very seriously about this flap doodle.

Right now, having any or the other title is meaningless. Who gives a fuck about the WBO belt when you have the IBF and WBA? Who gives a fuck about the WBC when you have the IBF and WBO straps? See the picture? Throw in there the Ring title, and one can see how potential revenue is being lost on good fighters being relegated to non descript positions.

When the belts are fragmented like this, then it should be automatic that one champ fights the other champ. AUTOMATIC.

Easier said than done with these money grabbing scums

It's the only way to save their reputations. Shoots, we don't even need them to make big money fights anymore. We know who we wanna pay to see fight.

[ykdadamaja]

.... and, with sanctioning fees for each organization, it can become costly for fighters and promoters to keep more than one belt. Why would I pay sanctioning fees to two orgs when I am only going to fight one guy? lolololol...