Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    I feel the draw was ok with the rematch i wish the fight was a 15 rounder because Leonard would of fucking knocked Hearns out. I fell both do fine against the current crop Hearns was pretty leget with win over Hill and others. But Leonard and Hearns were kinda past thier best days and above best weight which was ww but they had alot of skill. Ward would be the hardest test but i think Hearns and Leonard would cause him problems especially hearns he was hard to out box really fucking hard to out box need to go for the ko most of the time.
    Last edited by Mr140; 07-07-2014 at 02:19 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,271
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    I was ok with the draw, never saw it a robbery either. Both were on the tail end. Hell I'm still not convinced Hearns really beat Kinchen . I think Ward does better than the others and hypothetically could top those versions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1224
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    SRL wins all of them by UD

    Hearns wins all of them, KO's most of them

    Hagler wins all of them, KO's most of them

    Monzon wins all of them and gets arrested for murder.... again !

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2493
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    SRL wins all of them by UD

    Hearns wins all of them, KO's most of them

    Hagler wins all of them, KO's most of them

    Monzon wins all of them and gets arrested for murder.... again !
    Yes indeed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    748
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    Id struggle to see Leonard or Hearns beating these guys. Leonard fought twice at super middle and one at light heavy. At super middle he fought Duran and Hearns. Duran coming to the end of his career and should never have gone so high in weight and Hearns while probably bigger at the weight was still not a natural super middle. The super middles would be too big and too strong for Leonard in my opinion. Id say Froch stops him, Ward smothers him and stops him late or by UD. He may grind out points wins over the others but could also see them stopping him.

    Hearns, in my opinion, didnt fight anyone of note at the higher weights. Again I think the stronger guys nowadays would stop him at super middle or light heavy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2493
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Id struggle to see Leonard or Hearns beating these guys. Leonard fought twice at super middle and one at light heavy. At super middle he fought Duran and Hearns. Duran coming to the end of his career and should never have gone so high in weight and Hearns while probably bigger at the weight was still not a natural super middle. The super middles would be too big and too strong for Leonard in my opinion. Id say Froch stops him, Ward smothers him and stops him late or by UD. He may grind out points wins over the others but could also see them stopping him.

    Hearns, in my opinion, didnt fight anyone of note at the higher weights. Again I think the stronger guys nowadays would stop him at super middle or light heavy.
    He fought and outpointed an unbeaten Virgil Hill at LHW .

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    3,502
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    748
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Id struggle to see Leonard or Hearns beating these guys. Leonard fought twice at super middle and one at light heavy. At super middle he fought Duran and Hearns. Duran coming to the end of his career and should never have gone so high in weight and Hearns while probably bigger at the weight was still not a natural super middle. The super middles would be too big and too strong for Leonard in my opinion. Id say Froch stops him, Ward smothers him and stops him late or by UD. He may grind out points wins over the others but could also see them stopping him.

    Hearns, in my opinion, didnt fight anyone of note at the higher weights. Again I think the stronger guys nowadays would stop him at super middle or light heavy.
    He fought and outpointed an unbeaten Virgil Hill at LHW .
    Im not sure Virgil Hill was that good and he also wasnt that big a puncher. It was a big win for Hearns but i wasnt overly impressed by him in it and then he went and lost in his next fight. I also believe Stewart left him after the Hill fight and thought he should retire.

    Im not argueing who the better P4P fighters were I just dont think the guys could cope with the size and power of todays super middleweights. For example Hill weighed in at 173 for his fight v Hearns so I dont imagine he was more then 180 in the ring. Light heavies like Stevenson are probably close to 200 in the ring.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1380
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    I don't think they match up particularly well. And before people say "BUT ITS RAY LEONARD AND HEARNS", yeah, but by '89 they were both years out of their prime and quite honestly both guys weren't even true SMW's. SRL weighed in at 160 and Hearns at 162.

    The SMW guys today are just too big for them to be as effective as they were IMO, and they were too far out of their primes when they were at SMW.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1380
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    Andre Ward would have eaten '89 SRL alive.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3145
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Leonard-Hearns 1989 Supermiddles-vs-2014 Top Dogs. Fact.

    No supermiddle in history would have "eaten SRL alive"

    He was clearly not a supermiddle but watch that 89 fight and picture him against todays crop. He's wiping the floor with all but a few of the current top 10.

    Just like modern great fighters like Floyd can give weight away so could have Leonard.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Leonard/Hearns 2- The judges had it right!
    By ykdadamaja in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 05:53 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-30-2007, 07:40 AM
  3. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-22-2007, 06:06 PM
  4. Replies: 116
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 09:29 PM
  5. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-12-2006, 10:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing