How much faith do you put in these scientists who in the 1990's were baffled by El Niño....you're telling me they can get confused by a weather cycle but their computer models for the next 50-100 years are spot on?
As far as I can tell, the El Niño phenomenon of that era were something of an anomaly. Scientists had not seen such an occurrence in modern times, so of course they were put off. You seem to believe that climate science should be perfection incarnate while you allow medical science to grow and learn. Science is science, bud. With the few exceptions I've noted previously, all science must defer to the current data and change to incorporate new information. That's the whole damn point. If human beings suddenly generated the ability of telekinesis, then medical science would be baffled and then work hard to try to explain it. That's the whole game.
Yes I doubt their predictions.
This is my shocked face.
Medical science is a good point there have been failings there but there has also been tangible success. Where's the tangible success for the global warming crowd? There has been 0 warming since 1998 but we're pumping out more CO2....odd that considering how close to killing the planet we are. By Al Gore's clock we have about 1 1/2 years left before the whole world burns. You can tell me Al is not a scientist but correct me if I'm wrong he won the Nobel Prize......along with the IPCC whose models (along with Gore's) are well off the mark when compared to reality.
There has been 0 warming since 1998. Bold claim - especially with absolutely zilch to back it up. You can say that you have an 18 inch pecker too, but until you provide proof, no one is gonna believe you.
I challenge you to offer scientific proof of this claim. Using a source of respected data - you can choose, so long as it is a reputable source (and www.idontbelievesciencecauseidontunderstandit.com does not count) - I challenge you to show me the veracity of your claim. When I get a chance, which may be a couple of days, I'll gather data from at least three different sources and do the analysis myself. This is not modeling - we're not talking about predicting the future - but using established data to support your claim.
Note that links to websites making this claim do not constitute proof. I want to see your data and your method for making such a claim. Time to walk the walk instead of talking the talk.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks