How's that analysis going? Do you need some help?

So while you're working on that, maybe you can help me understand something. Previously in this thread you stated, and I quote:

"The thing is NASA and NOAA got caught fudging the numbers as have other "scientists" ....so what do they have to do to get you to question them? They got caught LYING, FACT."

And you then proceed to post an article published by the NOAA as "evidence" to support your claim. Moreover, you question if *I* believe the NOAA is a good source - again, I quote:

"So you're saying NOAA is NOT a good source?"

So which is it? Is the NOAA a trusted source of information ONLY when they agree with your beliefs?

It's pretty piss poor when you bash the hell out of them and then use their report to support your claim.

I thought you were better than this.

Oh yeah - still waiting.

Claim: There has been 0 warming since 1998.

Lyle's analysis of any reputable source of data to support his claim: