Although I believe you are exaggerating about Hopkins, I also believe that you are touching on a possible answer to the question being posed. Hopkins was not born with all of that "natural" ability and learned his craft in the school of hard knocks. He's as much a modern day James Scott as he is a 21st century Archie Moore. And therein lies the difference imo. And its not just the physical difference. Hops style is built for longevity, Roys was not. But just as strongly imo is what rests above the shoulders. Hops attitude which was gained from his past is just as resilient as his skills.
And ftr fighters have been taking advantage of where the ref is forever. Many of Hops shots that are called cheap are actually smart. He had the anticipation of the break down to a science and rode the line on "protect yourself at all times." I dont think he's near the dirty fighter that he is accused of being. The same ring generalship and study he uses against fighters he also uses with the refs.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes:

Reply With Quote


I think Inuit, like most hardcore fans, realizes how rampant drugs are in the sport. The fact is Roy never actually tested positive for a specifically banned substance, whether he did use them and got away with it is anyones guess, just as it is for practically every elite fighter of the past few decades. Mosley was on the BALCO mailing list and has since admitted to using, it's a little bit different.
, footloose fancy free, relaxed attitude so the body follows as did the relaxed guard and shoulders allowing him to get in his own zone faster,shoot from the hip,hitting during moves for more speed and percussion, more risks, more damage given and undertaken, risked his whole hand while playing them face up.
Bookmarks