Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
One side uses precision bombing, smart bombs that behead, blow apart, destroy entire families, bury people alive, etc but those pictures don't make it out or are called collateral damage. Crimes against humanity are crimes against humanity.

The other side eats the organs of its enemies, butchers with cleavers and beheads people in front of camera's and allows children to hold up the trophy. Are these any more or less barbaric then the acts
committed from the air or ground of the more technically sophisticated?

These people who go to such raw extremes don't even seem part of the same species. But we and I speak of myself are horrified on how the act is done but not the act itself. Its an uncomfortable feeling for me because I recognize my own hypocrisy.

I'm left with an overall conclusion that humankind (men specifically) are inherently bad not good and nothing convinces more of that fact then history and present day. Einstein was right barring some age of enlightenment, the thinking of mankind does not change.
Again very good points, that's it but us lot can discus this, and at no point do we make
threats to kill each other, the people that are doing theses things are not like us one bit.
They are murders of women and children, up close and personal you can't be right in the
head to do such things.
Sitting in a Apace helicopter 2 miles or so away, watching a video screen pressing a button wiping
out 30 plus people, it does dehumanise the act, until you see what you have done.!!!!
The wrongs of War the rights of War,!!!!!!!! were do you start were do you stop,!!!!! some people
make decisions, and they cost lives, some must do it with a heavy heart, and others don't give
a shit.