Seemingly some of these organisations are run by questionable people. I suspect we will see more articles about Mandelson (allegedly) coming out soonish and he apparently chairs one of them (cannot recall which). There are worrying links in all areas where you think children should be being protected.
As for Prince Phillip, he seems a very questionable sort based on the evidence of that article and other research easily looked into. We spend millions on locking up a non-rapist in Julian Assange, but we give these perverted Royals their silly ceremonies which cost tens of millions and which are typically disrespected with with the most insidious behaviour in a matter of months. They literally spit upon us all laughing as we struggle.
I can imagine the Queen sneering 'How dull and moral they all are...and poor too.' 'Just eaters, my dear', frowns Phillip. These are not good people and are no example. The only reason for them to be there is to be an example and they offer scandal, scandal and perversion. It's a recipe book of how not to lead a country. An argument can be made, 'but the city of London brings in money!'. But for whom and what cost, none of these things offer anything outside of the square mile.
Here's another article touching upon his behaviour. Of course he met the Queen at 13! Red flags there alone and if it was only the one rumour or whatever, I would leave it, but it's an endless litany of naughtiness.
Prince Philip, Filthy Secrets, Princess Diana, Jimmy Savile and the 100 Year D-Notice | thecolemanexperience
Bookmarks