only way to beat Mayweather is by KO, anyone think different?

[Manos de Piedra]

Is there anyone who thinks another fighter can get a decision against floyd in Vegas? Let's face it, everyone kisses his ass, judges, venues, refs( how many elbows has floyd got away with?).

I definitely think that , yes, the only way to beat Floyd is by KO. and what track star can catch that elusive runner?? lol. I'm just sick of this whole BS. The greats went and fought in other places.
Manilla, Africa, England, Pacman is fighting in china! But not floyd, why would you leave the safety of a place that wont let you lose?

Cmon Marcos, do what the boxing world needs! Change.

I do give floyd props for taking this fight though. I never thought he would.

More like why would he leave a place where he makes tons of money? because he's not an idiot. Well he is an idiot but not when it comes to making money.

The judges kiss his ass?? How did you come to that conclusion?
His fights have'nt been close for the judges to favour him, apart from the first Castillo fight. Other than that the decisions in the De la Hoya,Canelo and Maidana fights should all have been comfortable UDs for Floyd.

We can sit here and pick apart every single fighter's record throughout the history of boxing and we will find plenty of things wrong with them.


Going back to your original question, yes I do think the only way to beat Floyd would be by KO or several KDs because you can't out box him to get a decision.

[p4pking]

I don't buy that the judges treat him any differently either, you aren't seeing really bad scores in his favour for the most part. Need to go back to the first Castillo fight for that, or maybe one or two others, I think the Cotto fight one judge had a near shutout if I remember.
If Maidana actually pulls this off, it's almost certainly going to be by decision and I don't see why he'd get shafted. One judge had the first fight dead even which is actually very generous to Maidana, not to mention the Alvarez fight etc.