Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Psychological Greats

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1436
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    I've always enjoyed Ricardo El Matador Mayorga's pre-fight antics and psychological warfare... 'cept he takes a good @$$-whupping at the fight though...
    It wasn't always that way.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    801
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bradlee180 View Post
    I've always enjoyed Ricardo El Matador Mayorga's pre-fight antics and psychological warfare... 'cept he takes a good @$$-whupping at the fight though...
    It wasn't always that way.
    I always thought of Mayorga as a clown, his antics were so transparent.
    Last edited by beenKOed; 09-24-2014 at 10:35 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Master

    If you are blind, I can understand not 'seeing' the devastating mind game that Larry
    dished on Muhammad.

    After that bout, everyone turned their back on Muhammad and felt sorry for him.

    Pity is the worst type of 'psychological pain'.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,772
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom View Post
    Master

    If you are blind, I can understand not 'seeing' the devastating mind game that Larry
    dished on Muhammad.

    After that bout, everyone turned their back on Muhammad and felt sorry for him.

    Pity is the worst type of 'psychological pain'.
    Are you that blind to see that Holmes did not have to carry out any mind games on Ali. Muhammad was barely able to talk and walk never mind get in the ring with a great hungry champion.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,795
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Not True

    Muhammad Ali was in great physical shape, and was as sharp as a 'tack'.

    He even said so himself.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,772
    Mentioned
    1700 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom View Post
    Not True

    Muhammad Ali was in great physical shape, and was as sharp as a 'tack'.

    He even said so himself.
    He would say that he was selling the fight! Look at him, he was ill. Why do you not see that?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    793
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom View Post
    Not True

    Muhammad Ali was in great physical shape, and was as sharp as a 'tack'.

    He even said so himself.
    He would say that he was selling the fight! Look at him, he was ill. Why do you not see that?
    Master, I think he is just messing with you. Ali was a fraction of the fighter he was during his prime when they met. I would just let it go, if he really feels like that there isn't anything u r going to be able to say to change his mind anyways.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,433
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    717
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom View Post
    Not True

    Muhammad Ali was in great physical shape, and was as sharp as a 'tack'.

    He even said so himself.
    I cannot recall the source, but peoplpe say his hands were shaking and he did act like a person with mental problems
    Learn Mike Tyson style and elements of Peekaboo @ SugarBoxing

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    711
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    This psychological stuff is viewed wrong. Yes Hopkins pulled some nice stunts but any way you look at it he was going to box the WW great Tito to bits. Any way you look at it he was going to beat Holmes. You see evidence that the result is actually drawn from the result by someone saying it didn't work against Calzaghe. The difference wasn't the psychological war, it was the opponent.People say he won this fight so that psychological stuff must have worked or he lost so it must not have. When it was never about that.

    Psychological war is fought in small details. Make a guy think about your straight right when your gameplan revolves around the left hook. If a guy has stamina issues make him think about that, nothing taxes the body like nerves. Or maybe they fight at a slower pace.

    Drawing conclusions from the result is faulty, look at the action. Don't look at the whole, was a detail effected and capitalized on. We fans want to make dramatic all encompassing statements. To make these statements we stretch small factors into deciding factors.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    793
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    This psychological stuff is viewed wrong. Yes Hopkins pulled some nice stunts but any way you look at it he was going to box the WW great Tito to bits. Any way you look at it he was going to beat Holmes. You see evidence that the result is actually drawn from the result by someone saying it didn't work against Calzaghe. The difference wasn't the psychological war, it was the opponent.People say he won this fight so that psychological stuff must have worked or he lost so it must not have. When it was never about that.

    Psychological war is fought in small details. Make a guy think about your straight right when your gameplan revolves around the left hook. If a guy has stamina issues make him think about that, nothing taxes the body like nerves. Or maybe they fight at a slower pace.

    Drawing conclusions from the result is faulty, look at the action. Don't look at the whole, was a detail effected and capitalized on. We fans want to make dramatic all encompassing statements. To make these statements we stretch small factors into deciding factors.
    That is a stretch Ron. Again, Hop had everyone, including Tito, looking for a back alley brawl and came out and put on a clinic. You can try and downplay it all you want, but ANYONE who followed the sport at that time was shocked at Hopkins fighting like that. Shocked.

    As for looking at the small things, I used the example of Pascal in the rematch. If you don't think it messed with Pascals mind to have Hop constantly discuss Pascals stamina issues, you're crazy. Pascal was mentally exhausted by the 10th round. Again, the most impressive part of Hops mind games is how he uses them on judges n refs with success as well.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,075
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    711
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    This psychological stuff is viewed wrong. Yes Hopkins pulled some nice stunts but any way you look at it he was going to box the WW great Tito to bits. Any way you look at it he was going to beat Holmes. You see evidence that the result is actually drawn from the result by someone saying it didn't work against Calzaghe. The difference wasn't the psychological war, it was the opponent.People say he won this fight so that psychological stuff must have worked or he lost so it must not have. When it was never about that.

    Psychological war is fought in small details. Make a guy think about your straight right when your gameplan revolves around the left hook. If a guy has stamina issues make him think about that, nothing taxes the body like nerves. Or maybe they fight at a slower pace.

    Drawing conclusions from the result is faulty, look at the action. Don't look at the whole, was a detail effected and capitalized on. We fans want to make dramatic all encompassing statements. To make these statements we stretch small factors into deciding factors.
    That is a stretch Ron. Again, Hop had everyone, including Tito, looking for a back alley brawl and came out and put on a clinic. You can try and downplay it all you want, but ANYONE who followed the sport at that time was shocked at Hopkins fighting like that. Shocked.

    As for looking at the small things, I used the example of Pascal in the rematch. If you don't think it messed with Pascals mind to have Hop constantly discuss Pascals stamina issues, you're crazy. Pascal was mentally exhausted by the 10th round. Again, the most impressive part of Hops mind games is how he uses them on judges n refs with success as well.
    First, I wasn't surprised by how Hop fought in the least. The only aspect that was a surprise to me was how clean he fought.

    As for your second part, did you read my post? I spoke about how you definitely call attention to stamina issues.

    I don't think he's had much success tricking judges. I can't think of one fight he should have lost but was awarded but I can think of multiple he might have actually won but wasn't awarded.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Psychological Greats

    Yeah Foreman dıd ıt ın a weırd way dıdnt he. Just how could that clubber be subtle, I dont know, but he seemed to ınfluence referees especıally, got away wıth alot of pushıng and never lost a poınt.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-12-2012, 08:04 AM
  2. Sporting Greats
    By Memphis in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 03-09-2012, 08:10 PM
  3. Hopkins and Over-40 Greats
    By SorceryatCaesar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-25-2009, 04:52 PM
  4. Khan - I'm with the greats now
    By sonny78 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-21-2008, 11:03 PM
  5. Past Greats Vs. Current Greats
    By RozzySean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-16-2006, 07:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing