Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote Originally Posted by amat
Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote Originally Posted by amat
Readin around a bit, I think I'm agreeing with Wack more then anyone here. Close fight. Some of you are a bit dellusional imo to say he gave a boxing lesson or that he would KO Peter, or that he even hurt him tonight. It wasn't a robbery, just a close fight.
Agreed. It was just a close fight.

It could have gone either way. Watched it again last night & today at work (YES I HAVE A JOB... ) & each time that I saw it...it was closer for Peter & then one minute closer for Toney.

There was no dominating & no boxing clinic & no robbery...just a close fight & honestly...the better man for the division won.

There's no chance of an explosive fight between Toney Maskaev...imagine the bombs that will be thrown between Peter Maskaev.

Look at the bigger picture peoples.
CC. Plus the fact that I'm a big Sam Peter fan (gotta put Sam in there so it doesn't come off wrong ), it was a very releiving decision.
back.

Yeah...I'm down with Peter too...SAM PETER!!!

But that was a close fight...seriously...there were rounds that I almost had no clue who to give it to. I was still sorting it out in me brain during the following rounds. The judges had to be hating life.

I think that the decision is right...but the scores were fwocked.
Thats the reason the scores were so screwy. So many rounds that close and they gave enough to Sam Peter that the scroes didnt truly reflect the actuall fight.