Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    There were at least 2 or 3 fights in between Joe's proposition and the DLH fight though. DLH was newly at 154 at that time, he hadn't even forayed up to MW.

    For the record, I don't blame Hopkins for not jumping up to face Calzaghe, every champ in the history of boxing has done the same kind of thing. I'm just saying we should stop being naive children about it and pretending people only care about legacy and don't factor in risk/reward. It's just silly.
    Last edited by Beanflicker; 11-16-2014 at 10:10 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    682
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    There were at least 2 or 3 fights in between Joe's proposition and the DLH fight though. DLH was newly at 154 at that time, he hadn't even forayed up to MW.

    For the record, I don't blame Hopkins for not jumping up to face Calzaghe, every champ in the history of boxing has done the same kind of thing. I'm just saying we should stop being naive children about it and pretending people only care about legacy and don't factor in risk/reward. It's just silly.
    No way. Bhop has never thought about the risk/reward for any fight. You take that back. He purely fights for legacy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    774
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    There were at least 2 or 3 fights in between Joe's proposition and the DLH fight though. DLH was newly at 154 at that time, he hadn't even forayed up to MW.

    For the record, I don't blame Hopkins for not jumping up to face Calzaghe, every champ in the history of boxing has done the same kind of thing. I'm just saying we should stop being naive children about it and pretending people only care about legacy and don't factor in risk/reward. It's just silly.
    No way. Bhop has never thought about the risk/reward for any fight. You take that back. He purely fights for legacy.
    Hop does fight for legacy. He just fought the guy at 175 that everyone else was running from. He fought him for like, $1M. That isn't a great payday for that kind of risk, especially when you consider Floyd gets over $20M for MAIDANA. Joe C., at that time, didn't do much for Hops legacy. Another super fight did. Hop was chasing Roy and Oscar at that point, and I can't remember ANYONE other than Joe pushing for that fight. Compare that demand for the overwhelming push from EVERYONE for Floyd to fight Manny.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    There were at least 2 or 3 fights in between Joe's proposition and the DLH fight though. DLH was newly at 154 at that time, he hadn't even forayed up to MW.

    For the record, I don't blame Hopkins for not jumping up to face Calzaghe, every champ in the history of boxing has done the same kind of thing. I'm just saying we should stop being naive children about it and pretending people only care about legacy and don't factor in risk/reward. It's just silly.
    No way. Bhop has never thought about the risk/reward for any fight. You take that back. He purely fights for legacy.
    Hopkins did want to become light heavyweight champion to secure his legacy by achieving something Ray Robinson could not do.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    682
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Comparing Floyd and Bhop's opposition

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    You can not blame Hopkins for not taking Joe at super middle. He use Joe as a negotiating tool to get Oscar which was a bigger money and easier fight.
    There were at least 2 or 3 fights in between Joe's proposition and the DLH fight though. DLH was newly at 154 at that time, he hadn't even forayed up to MW.

    For the record, I don't blame Hopkins for not jumping up to face Calzaghe, every champ in the history of boxing has done the same kind of thing. I'm just saying we should stop being naive children about it and pretending people only care about legacy and don't factor in risk/reward. It's just silly.
    No way. Bhop has never thought about the risk/reward for any fight. You take that back. He purely fights for legacy.
    Hopkins did want to become light heavyweight champion to secure his legacy by achieving something Ray Robinson could not do.
    I know but I was pointing out the joke that he has never considered anything but legacy when taking a fight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Quality of Opposition
    By mikeeod in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 09-21-2014, 07:54 PM
  2. Comparing Trinidad's losses
    By TitoFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-24-2008, 01:27 PM
  3. Comparing heavyweights from different eras
    By Googoogachoob in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 02:10 PM
  4. Replies: 86
    Last Post: 07-28-2007, 12:32 PM
  5. Comparing Hatton and Hamed!
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2006, 08:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing