Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ykdadamaja View Post
Macklin was never all of that. Paper thing. Martin Murray was always the better and more durable...
I do not think Barker, Murray, Macklin are that good compared to Benn, Watson and Eubanks.
No doubt about that.... but I think Murray needs his chance to prove. Murray just hasn't been given the fairer shake like the weaker Martin and Barker and even Paul Smith.