Interesting comparison between Jr, Sr & BJS

[Silkeyjoe]

I have just compiled stats from Eubank Jr, Sr and BJS careers.

Iv done it starting with Jr's 18 fights. Iv then taken Srs 18 bouts leading up to the Benn fight to prove he hadnt fought any better quality before stopping one of the most dangerous fighters in the world.





I wasn't going to bother looking at Saunders first 18 fights as id been





led to believe as have a lot of other people that Saunders comp blows Eubank Jrs out the water but it was




quite interesting. He does have his last two fights which I havent added but BJS career is nearly 3 years

older than Jrs!!!

Eubank Jr 18 fights, 240 wins, 140 losses, 23 draws, 13 by ko

Eubank Sr 18 fights previous to


Benn, 224 wins, 214 losses, 34 draws, 13 by ko

Saunders first 18 fights, 228 wins, , 174 losses, 17 draws



Quite interesting to see Saunders opponents dont have as many wins and also have more losses. Yes his




last two fights are better quality than who Eubank has faced but he has nearly 3 years as a pro on Eubank.





Eubank is facing the European, British and Commonwealth champ in his 3rd year whereas Billy joe


Saunders is fighting someone who has faced nobodies 5 years in to his career!

So is this how it works Ross? I answer this question in another thread, you don't reply, and you start another thread without responding to my answer to your "theory".
Would you like me to copy and paste my reply to this thread? Or does that mean you'll have to start another thread and hope nobody notices.

Ross isnt worth argueing with. He is completely biased towards fighters he likes and no logic will turn his opinion. He claims a record high 261 pound Chisora was fit despite not being able to throw a punch after round 3. He takes no notice of the 240 pound Chisora (who was weaker because he weighed less) being able to throw punches for 12 rounds against Helenius and Vitali. Hes clueless when talking about fighters he likes and better off just being ignored.