Eubank Sr. the REASON...

[g3org3]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

[Fenster]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

Point out a big round jr had as well then? To make it fair like

[g3org3]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

Point out a big round jr had as well then? To make it fair like

12 th could make a case for a 10-8 round Saunders was out of it at 1 point before the ref stopped the action. So what round did Saunders dominate ?

[Dark Lord Al]

Eubank didn't win .
The End.

[ross]

Eubank didn't win .
The End.

One judge thought he did.

I was thinking about split decisions last night. If one judge thinks you have won its unfair that you get a loss.

[Fenster]

Eubank didn't win .
The End.

One judge thought he did.

I was thinking about split decisions last night. If one judge thinks you have won its unfair that you get a loss.

Calzaghe-Hopkins was a SD. Who won?

[ross]

Eubank didn't win .
The End.

One judge thought he did.

I was thinking about split decisions last night. If one judge thinks you have won its unfair that you get a loss.

Calzaghe-Hopkins was a SD. Who won?

Eubank didn't need to crawl around on the floor looking for respite. Hopkins didn't finish the fight knocking Calzaghe all over the shop. Hopkins was fighting in front of his countrymen in his country.

[nuggetdotcom]

Eubank didn't win .
The End.

One judge thought he did.

I was thinking about split decisions last night. If one judge thinks you have won its unfair that you get a loss.

Calzaghe-Hopkins was a SD. Who won?

Hopkins, obviously, bloody judges cost me money!!!!!!!

[Fenster]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

Point out a big round jr had as well then? To make it fair like

12 th could make a case for a 10-8 round Saunders was out of it at 1 point before the ref stopped the action. So what round did Saunders dominate ?

10-8 round? Come on. The 12th round of Hopkins-Kovalev should have been a 10-6 then. I've watched the fight twice and didn't notice Billy Joe ever turned into a defensless drunk.

I don't think there was many "dominate" rounds. If "dominate" means one was wiping the floor with the other.

[g3org3]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

Point out a big round jr had as well then? To make it fair like

12 th could make a case for a 10-8 round Saunders was out of it at 1 point before the ref stopped the action. So what round did Saunders dominate ?

10-8 round? Come on. The 12th round of Hopkins-Kovalev should have been a 10-6 then. I've watched the fight twice and didn't notice Billy Joe ever turned into a defensless drunk.

I don't think there was many "dominate" rounds. If "dominate" means one was wiping the floor with the other.

I scored the 12th 10-9 but u could make a point for 10-8 had bjs hurt twice. All I'm saying is it was a close fight I feel eubank won and I didn't see 1 single round Saunders looked good in, every round he won was a close round he just edge his rounds but eubank took his rounds clearly.

[Fenster]

Infact can any1 on this forum point out a big round Saunders won ? Because I want to go rematch that round. Just 1 round ?

Point out a big round jr had as well then? To make it fair like

12 th could make a case for a 10-8 round Saunders was out of it at 1 point before the ref stopped the action. So what round did Saunders dominate ?

10-8 round? Come on. The 12th round of Hopkins-Kovalev should have been a 10-6 then. I've watched the fight twice and didn't notice Billy Joe ever turned into a defensless drunk.

I don't think there was many "dominate" rounds. If "dominate" means one was wiping the floor with the other.

I scored the 12th 10-9 but u could make a point for 10-8 had bjs hurt twice. All I'm saying is it was a close fight I feel eubank won and I didn't see 1 single round Saunders looked good in, every round he won was a close round he just edge his rounds but eubank took his rounds clearly.

I agree it was a close fight. On second viewing I could give Eubank a draw. I didn't think either fighter was ever in serious trouble though.

[ross]

What Eubank can take from this is he has all the natural tools, attributes and ability to improve with experience. He hurt Saunders frequently, no one else has but thats not saying much as Saunders hasn't done much himself yet. He took some flush shots and was never really hurt. Saunders is fooling himself he had Cjris on wobbly legs in the second.

Eubank can get better. He's gone from fighting journeymen to fighting the defending British, Commonwealth and European champ and one judge had him a winner.

Saunders will also benefit from this. Hopefully he wins the WBO and hopefully Warren sniffs the big money rematch before Saunders fucks it up by losing to someone else and we get a rematch. Chrishas more room for improvement. If he had started putting the punches together and the pressure 5 rounds earlier I believe there would be no debate now because Saunders would have been stopped.

Don't forget this was a fitter, better prepared fighter than those mythical, amazing, british, undefeated fighters faced

[Dark Lord Al]

What Eubank can take from this is he has all the natural tools, attributes and ability to improve with experience. He hurt Saunders frequently, no one else has but thats not saying much as Saunders hasn't done much himself yet. He took some flush shots and was never really hurt. Saunders is fooling himself he had Cjris on wobbly legs in the second.

Eubank can get better. He's gone from fighting journeymen to fighting the defending British, Commonwealth and European champ and one judge had him a winner.

Saunders will also benefit from this. Hopefully he wins the WBO and hopefully Warren sniffs the big money rematch before Saunders fucks it up by losing to someone else and we get a rematch. Chrishas more room for improvement. If he had started putting the punches together and the pressure 5 rounds earlier I believe there would be no debate now because Saunders would have been stopped.

Don't forget this was a fitter, better prepared fighter than those mythical, amazing, british, undefeated fighters faced

So what were his tactics and reasons then for not putting pressure on him earlier ?

[g3org3]

What Eubank can take from this is he has all the natural tools, attributes and ability to improve with experience. He hurt Saunders frequently, no one else has but thats not saying much as Saunders hasn't done much himself yet. He took some flush shots and was never really hurt. Saunders is fooling himself he had Cjris on wobbly legs in the second.

Eubank can get better. He's gone from fighting journeymen to fighting the defending British, Commonwealth and European champ and one judge had him a winner.

Saunders will also benefit from this. Hopefully he wins the WBO and hopefully Warren sniffs the big money rematch before Saunders fucks it up by losing to someone else and we get a rematch. Chrishas more room for improvement. If he had started putting the punches together and the pressure 5 rounds earlier I believe there would be no debate now because Saunders would have been stopped.

Don't forget this was a fitter, better prepared fighter than those mythical, amazing, british, undefeated fighters faced

Lol yea I seen that interview were Saunders says he wobbled eubank in the 2nd. I don't know how he managed to keep a straight face chatting that pish