I never bought into the idea that the judges have unfortunate angles at ringside because if that were true, it would have been fixed long ago. Judges would score a fight, get reprimanded for it, rewatch the fight on tape and say "I couldn't see any of that from where I was sitting." Judges judge many fights so they have many opportunities to say that the seating isn't ideal for judging.

Corrupt judging is basically the problem IMO. the only way to fix it is for judges to have their check withheld and even suspended for really bad decisions. My problem with bad decisions is that there is no way it's a coincidence that all boxing writers, forum members, normal viewers, etc all have the fight for one fighter and it just so happens that 2 judges score it for the other fighter. If it happened once it could be a coincidence, but when it happens all the time, there is something going on.

Honestly, I think the best scorers are the Showtime ringside unofficial judges. I feel like they do the best because they usually have around what I have (which says a lot because I'm the best boxing judge).