
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
I see what you did there @
Fenster.
Excellent point
Passive aggressiveness aside though, I only asked Facster to tell me what he thought Hamed's
single best win was, when Facster failed to chose
one due to there being 'too many' (his words) to choose from did I cut him some slack and suggest 5.
5 is an arbitrary number, I only asked for one and I'm still waiting for it.
With Barrera it's an easy pick... Morales.
Not only was Morales a(nother) undefeated, two weight champion for Barrera to beat, he was able to follow up his first loss to MaB by reclaiming his belt and then winning and defending the WBC title in a third weight class, he then followed up his second loss to MaB by beating Manny Pacquaio and 6 years later even won a title in a 4th weight class, long after most would write him off.
Sure (like everybody else at the top) Morales dispatched of the likes of Kevin Kelly, but it's how Morales fought on and continued to achieve even after losing to MaB that put him on that next tier. It's not just wins, it's how defeat is followed.
The one thing Morales, Marquez, Barrera, Marquez and Pac have in common is that they all fought and
beat at least
one (not five, lol) person from that list, for me that's a criteria you need to meet before we even consider debating you the best of that era.
Beating guys a level below that, but in impressive fashion helps, but it's not enough alone. What if RJJ didn't have a W over Hopkins and Toney? Would he still be seen as a great middle-super middle by as many?
Bookmarks