Huge Benghazi bombshell -- Obama actually in trouble now

[El Kabong]

Kirkland, why do you insist on having your nose up the ads of America. The Bangahzi response was bungled, pure and simple.

I pay taxes over there and the idiots that govern you directly affect me and what I do for a living. So I'm entitled to an opinion.

Kirk, you are just like me, you may pay taxes here but that doesn't mean they give a shit what we think.

Yes but they can't stop us having opinions, can they?

No you can be as stupid as you like......as if I had to tell you that, but who knows, maybe you were holding a little back

[El Kabong]

EXCLUSIVE: Benghazi Heroes Debunk House Intel Report as 'Full of Inaccuracies' with Firsthand Account

.....but hell those guys were only THERE ON THE GROUND IN BENGHAZI

[Kirkland Laing]

EXCLUSIVE: Benghazi Heroes Debunk House Intel Report as 'Full of Inaccuracies' with Firsthand Account

.....but hell those guys were only THERE ON THE GROUND IN BENGHAZI

These people already testified to at least the last inquiry.

In 2016 Hikkary will almost certainly be running for prez. If she is she'll be the Democratic nominee and do you know what half the GOP campaign platform will be? Fucking Benghazi. They're going to have three or four new Benghazi inquiries between then and now to keep the rabble roused and ready to vote GOP in 2016. And people like these guys, who have a book out and are promoting it in the sponsored advertising posing as an article that you linked, will be front and centre in the GOP campaign to defeat Hillary. They don't have to worry about people they can fool all of the time like yourself because you'll swallow anything but these guys will be a key element in the campaign to try and persuade low information voters to distrust Hillary.

It won't work though. Absent a recession or economic meltdown Hillary will cruise to victory. If there is a recession/meltdown she'll lose anyway. So stuff like this is just there to fool the rubes.

[El Kabong]

Good for you...not reading the article and keeping your head in the sand....good for you.

[El Kabong]

It won't work though. Absent a recession or economic meltdown Hillary will cruise to victory. If there is a recession/meltdown she'll lose anyway. So stuff like this is just there to fool the rubes.

Yeah the entire 20 people listening to her speech at Georgetown are "super psyched"





#readyforhillary



You're a fucking dope

[El Kabong]

Kirkland, are you ready to #standupwithhillary

[Kirkland Laing]

Kirkland, are you ready to #standupwithhillary

Are you ready for eight years of Hillary to follow the eight years of Kenyan socialism?

[El Kabong]

Are you ready for eight years of Hillary to follow the eight years of Kenyan socialism?

I don't like Hillary at all, but even recusing my political beliefs from the argument I can't see how she'll A) Be the candidate and B ) win the general election for the following reasons.

1. Her name alone. Clinton. So you're telling the American people we'd willingly go H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Hillary Clinton? And you figure we'd be ok with that? We don't do kings and we don't do royal families...not even Jeb Bush will win this election.

2. Again her age/health....is it sexist to bring those up? If that decisions was Hillary's to make she'd say yes in a heartbeat. That spill she took while getting on the airplane is going to stick with her as is her testimony on Benghazi...as will Benghazi in general, remember her 3 a.m. phone call ad? Yeah that's going to be used against her effectively.

3. Here's a question maybe you could answer on her behalf "What was her defining moment/best event/biggest deal as Secretary of State?"

[Reginald Perrin]

Obama could eat the head off a new born baby and he wouldn't get into any trouble. The media would simply spin it and say 'That baby had it coming, it just wouldn't stop crying. It was armed with a rubber duck!' Clinton versus Bush in the next election would be particularly vulgar and patronising. It makes you wonder why they bother wasting all that money on what is essentially a pantomime, but I guess when you look at where the money comes from it spins around in the same circles, so it isn't such a waste. Plus they can always print some more and give it to the banks who will then pick the next target on a map for their arms dealer friends. Afghanistan is producing record levels of opium, so that's one success story complete. Nobody in trouble except the poor schmuk jailed for possession and unable to ever again participate in the greatest pantomime in town. Who cares about Benghazi when the circle jerk is winning? They got milk, baby.

[Kirkland Laing]

Are you ready for eight years of Hillary to follow the eight years of Kenyan socialism?

I don't like Hillary at all, but even recusing my political beliefs from the argument I can't see how she'll A) Be the candidate and B ) win the general election for the following reasons.

1. Her name alone. Clinton. So you're telling the American people we'd willingly go H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Hillary Clinton? And you figure we'd be ok with that? We don't do kings and we don't do royal families...not even Jeb Bush will win this election.

2. Again her age/health....is it sexist to bring those up? If that decisions was Hillary's to make she'd say yes in a heartbeat. That spill she took while getting on the airplane is going to stick with her as is her testimony on Benghazi...as will Benghazi in general, remember her 3 a.m. phone call ad? Yeah that's going to be used against her effectively.

3. Here's a question maybe you could answer on her behalf "What was her defining moment/best event/biggest deal as Secretary of State?"

1. Hillary is, as best we can tell, a woman. And so are roughly 50% of the American population. She may be the second Clinton running for prez but she's the first woman ever. And that fact overrides her surname. The surname is irrelevant anyway. It's only going to matter to people who are going to vote Republican anyway. It'll definitely be a talking point for the GOP during the election campaign....

2 ... as will her age and health and Benghazi which again are things which will only really matter to people who vote Republican. And they'll be all the GOP talk about (rmember Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth? Those fuckers selling that book you were on about the other day will be the 2016 SBVFTT for instance). The last thing the GOP want to do is talk about their actual policies so their entire campaign will be Benghazi, she's old, something she said in 1972, rehashed non-scandals from the 1990s, Bill Clinton's penis, the 2016 version of "you didn't build that".........

3. Again, something only GOP voters will find relevant. What was Romney's defining moment as governor of Mass.? Fucking Obamacare, that's what. How much coverage did that get in 2012? How much older was John McCain in 2008 than Hillary will be in 2016? How much coverage did his age get in the 2008 campaign? You need to stop looking at every single fucking thing through the prism of conservative media.

[Kirkland Laing]

but I guess when you look at where the money comes from it spins around in the same circles, so it isn't such a waste. Plus they can always print some more and give it to the banks

About three or four months ago you discovered the existence of fractionated reserve banking. To say your knowledge of where money comes from is at a Janet and John level is an insult to Janet and John books and the preschoolers who read them.

The Fed recently ended QE. Why aren't we currently seeing skyrocketing bond yields, hyperinflation and so on, hmmm?


Not currently happening. Why not?

[El Kabong]

1. Hillary is, as best we can tell, a woman. And so are roughly 50% of the American population. She may be the second Clinton running for prez but she's the first woman ever. And that fact overrides her surname. The surname is irrelevant anyway. It's only going to matter to people who are going to vote Republican anyway. It'll definitely be a talking point for the GOP during the election campaign....

2 ... as will her age and health and Benghazi which again are things which will only really matter to people who vote Republican. And they'll be all the GOP talk about (rmember Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth? Those fuckers selling that book you were on about the other day will be the 2016 SBVFTT for instance). The last thing the GOP want to do is talk about their actual policies so their entire campaign will be Benghazi, she's old, something she said in 1972, rehashed non-scandals from the 1990s, Bill Clinton's penis, the 2016 version of "you didn't build that".........

3. Again, something only GOP voters will find relevant. What was Romney's defining moment as governor of Mass.? Fucking Obamacare, that's what. How much coverage did that get in 2012? How much older was John McCain in 2008 than Hillary will be in 2016? How much coverage did his age get in the 2008 campaign? You need to stop looking at every single fucking thing through the prism of conservative media.

Hey if you want to elect her, then vote for her. I won't and I know a large portion of the United States won't vote for her because they never liked her to begin with which is kind of why she didn't win the last time she ran.

[walrus]

Are you ready for eight years of Hillary to follow the eight years of Kenyan socialism?

I don't like Hillary at all, but even recusing my political beliefs from the argument I can't see how she'll A) Be the candidate and B ) win the general election for the following reasons.

1. Her name alone. Clinton. So you're telling the American people we'd willingly go H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, W. Bush, Obama, Hillary Clinton? And you figure we'd be ok with that? We don't do kings and we don't do royal families...not even Jeb Bush will win this election.

2. Again her age/health....is it sexist to bring those up? If that decisions was Hillary's to make she'd say yes in a heartbeat. That spill she took while getting on the airplane is going to stick with her as is her testimony on Benghazi...as will Benghazi in general, remember her 3 a.m. phone call ad? Yeah that's going to be used against her effectively.

3. Here's a question maybe you could answer on her behalf "What was her defining moment/best event/biggest deal as Secretary of State?"

1. Hillary is, as best we can tell, a woman. And so are roughly 50% of the American population. She may be the second Clinton running for prez but she's the first woman ever. And that fact overrides her surname. The surname is irrelevant anyway. It's only going to matter to people who are going to vote Republican anyway. It'll definitely be a talking point for the GOP during the election campaign....

2 ... as will her age and health and Benghazi which again are things which will only really matter to people who vote Republican. And they'll be all the GOP talk about (rmember Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth? Those fuckers selling that book you were on about the other day will be the 2016 SBVFTT for instance). The last thing the GOP want to do is talk about their actual policies so their entire campaign will be Benghazi, she's old, something she said in 1972, rehashed non-scandals from the 1990s, Bill Clinton's penis, the 2016 version of "you didn't build that".........

3. Again, something only GOP voters will find relevant. What was Romney's defining moment as governor of Mass.? Fucking Obamacare, that's what. How much coverage did that get in 2012? How much older was John McCain in 2008 than Hillary will be in 2016? How much coverage did his age get in the 2008 campaign? You need to stop looking at every single fucking thing through the prism of conservative media.

Actually, since 1872 the US has had roughly 36 women run for president.

[Reginald Perrin]

but I guess when you look at where the money comes from it spins around in the same circles, so it isn't such a waste. Plus they can always print some more and give it to the banks

About three or four months ago you discovered the existence of fractionated reserve banking. To say your knowledge of where money comes from is at a Janet and John level is an insult to Janet and John books and the preschoolers who read them.

The Fed recently ended QE. Why aren't we currently seeing skyrocketing bond yields, hyperinflation and so on, hmmm?


Not currently happening. Why not?

As a prodigious, intelligent and successful man of the world (ice cream marketing, greatest seller of useless products etc), fractional reserve banking is something I have known about for many years. In certain nations it has become more than fractional reserve banking with infinite re-hypothecation meaning in essence that the money is emerging from a complete vacuum. The banks have nothing to back up their cooked and rather scruffy books beyond a wave of frauds and manipulations.

The Fed may have ended the latest round of money printing (fraud), but the scheme is a global one and the buck has merely been passed onto Japan. The reason we are not seeing hyper inflation is because the Feds printed money is being handed directly to the banks (almost for free) and they are holding onto it because, as I mentioned before, these institutions are insolvent. This isn't rocket science. Unless money actually gets passed on to the real economy there will be no significant inflation. All the inflation is in stocks and asset prices. In the real world wages are falling and continue to fall.

I hope this service has been of some use to you and I really appreciate the picture of those lovely little aristocrats.

[Andre]

Kirkland, are you ready to #standupwithhillary

She may just want to stick a cigar up a male interns ass and call it quits .