Re: "the man who caused more BLACKOUTS than Con-Ed"

Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust

Originally Posted by
Max Power

Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
That's how Ernie Shavers was introduced at MSG for the fight THAT HE WON against The Greatest.
And thank you for proving my point on the other thread about why Shavers must be upheld to the highest standards.
OTNB/nostalgist viewpoint: "Shavers beat Ali, Since Ali is great, Shavers must also be great", = both boxers are great.
MaxPower/modernist viewpoint: "Shavers beat Ali, Since Shavers is so shit, Ali must have been shockingly hopeless" = both boxers are worthless.
you DO realize that every great boxing historian and writer and voting board would laugh their asses off reading the things you say right? Its OK, you can be the One Beacon of Dissent

Boxing Histoian = generally worthless opinion altogether.
Boxing writer = only worthwhile opinion when the opinion coincides with facts
Voting board = Mostly consisting of unintelligentsia or those leftover who are allowed to vote.
Facts are facts, it is what it is.
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Bookmarks