earnie shavers: the hardest heavyweight puncher ever?

[brocktonblockbust]

Ernie Shavers was a bad ass . 76 wins 68 KOs. FACT. CASE CLOSED. GIVE SOME RESPECT.

All boxers are bad ass, otherwise they would not be boxers.

Earnie Shavers PROPER analysis...

If you exclude all opponents who have been KO'ed before and all opponents who had a loss within 1 year of their encounter with Shavers (a typical thing for cherry-pickers), it turns out that Shavers
KO'ed only 10 guys (median weight 201 lbs), of which 8 guys were bums (like Young Agabab 0-1, 196 lbs, or Steve Carter 15-7, 190 lbs), and only 2 were somewhat good: Howard Smith (17-2, 202 lbs) and Tony Perea (KO7) (16-1, 206 lbs).

Earnie Shavers = Cherry Picker, FACT

Earnie Shavers KO ratio all opponents = 90% (extremely hard puncher)
Earnie Shavers KO ratio vs 200+ opponents = 68% (hard puncher)
Earnie Shavers KO ratio vs 215+ opponents = 47% (featherfist)

Earnie shavers = Cruiser cruncher
Earnie Shavers = superheavyweight featherfist

Earnie Shavers needed 21 rounds per KO as opposed to all other modern power punchers who needed between 5-7 rounds per KO like Lamon Brewster, Shannon Briggs, Mike Tyson, Lewis, both Klitschko's etc. He has nothing in common with REAL power punchers.

Shavers famous 28 KO streak is reduce to a streak of 2 opponents in a row, once you exclude cruisers, bums and overlate round 13+ KO's. The lowest streak possible.


CONCLUSION: Shavers was a cherry picking, cruiser crunching, bum-buster with no appreciable skills whatsoever and a featherfist punch when viewed against TODAY'S criteria and failed against bigger and against quality opposition.

These are the facts. Case Closed.

Myth exposed.
Myth exposed.
Myth exposed.

Did Earnie ass-rape your mom? Because your "analyses" are a bunch of ho-hokum to the Umpteenth Degree. Meaningless comparisons and subjective "conclusions".

The Black Destroyer must a had a big dick as well as the NUMBER ONE PUNCH for all that old man butt hurt you're showing.

There was nothing "SUBJECTIVE" whatsoever in my analysis of Shavers. Mine was COMPLETELY objective utilising nothing except the actual records of Shavers and his opponents and comparing it with other boxers records. There can BE no more objective analysis.

The only comment subjective was that Earnie had no appreciable skills. An argument I doubt you would seriously want to challenge

Well blockbust, you seem to be able to tell me all about Earnies big dick, so I'm sure you've been more well acquainted with it than I'll ever be. No wonder you support the bum so much, your riding him! lol

I used to be a Film Producer in the porn industry. Earnie did one particular movie in '74 called "The Acorn Rips Mrs. MP a New One"

LOL It would have been considered "kiddie porn" back then and you should probably be prosecuted.

neither me nor Earnie were kids in '74.