If you can quote me any historian, writer or analyst or even forum voter/poster, who presents his opinion with factual evidence that I cannot easily refute, then I will acknowledge that historian or whatever as having a valid viewpoint.

If they make a statement purely on the authority of who they are backed with nothing but their opinion which happens to fly in the face of actual facts, then I will dismiss their opinion as worthless and label them as an idiot, as I have always done.

That's what I do, expose boxing's so called "experts" for the frauds that most of them are. It's basically my second job LOL.

MaxPower= the truth.. with a little bit of humour thrown in to make it readable haha