Alexander Povetkin- the best of the best!

[brocktonblockbust]

Hey. You're predictions are just as much subjective as mine. Nobody will ever know. But Willard would win at least 4 rounds against Adamek, and hurt him in a couple clinches inside too. Those men could fight 25-30 rounds with broken bones, no neutral corner. The clowns you champion are totally winded after ten rounds. Sam Huffin & Puffin Peters, Wladimir Gaspin For Breath Klitschko, David Hurt Lil' Pinky Toe Haye, Odlanir "Ow My Calf Muscle" Solis. Etc

[Max Power]

Hey. You're predictions are just as much subjective as mine. Nobody will ever know. But Willard would win at least 4 rounds against Adamek, and hurt him in a couple clinches inside too. Those men could fight 25-30 rounds with broken bones, no neutral corner. The clowns you champion are totally winded after ten rounds. Sam Huffin & Puffin Peters, Wladimir Gaspin For Breath Klitschko, David Hurt Lil' Pinky Toe Haye, Odlanir "Ow My Calf Muscle" Solis. Etc

I have already shown multiple occasions that such overlong fights were ALWAYS a rarity.

In fact in the history of boxing, approx. 70,000 fights, approximately only 1,600, 2%! went 13+ rounds, 13+!!!

Of those old boxers that fought these 20 odd rounders, they only each fought negligible of them also!

The lighter the boxer, the more rounds they can fight,

Any boxer can fight any number of rounds no matter the conditioning or the size by pacing.

Todays 12 rounders fight harder and are better conditioned than any of those ancient jokers

The more overlong fights, the more featherfisted the boxers in them.

But most importantly...

25 rounds, IS A SIGN OF FAILURE. Failure to win by KO! It means that the plan has failed! Whether the plan was wrong, or your opponent was able to thwart it does not matter.

You take a NEGATIVE feature of the drunken era of boxing and turn it into a virtue.

Myth exposed!

[brocktonblockbust]

Hey. You're predictions are just as much subjective as mine. Nobody will ever know. But Willard would win at least 4 rounds against Adamek, and hurt him in a couple clinches inside too. Those men could fight 25-30 rounds with broken bones, no neutral corner. The clowns you champion are totally winded after ten rounds. Sam Huffin & Puffin Peters, Wladimir Gaspin For Breath Klitschko, David Hurt Lil' Pinky Toe Haye, Odlanir "Ow My Calf Muscle" Solis. Etc

I have already shown multiple occasions that such overlong fights were ALWAYS a rarity.

In fact in the history of boxing, approx. 70,000 fights, approximately only 1,600, 2%! went 13+ rounds, 13+!!!

Of those old boxers that fought these 20 odd rounders, they only each fought negligible of them also!

The lighter the boxer, the more rounds they can fight,

Any boxer can fight any number of rounds no matter the conditioning or the size by pacing.

Todays 12 rounders fight harder and are better conditioned than any of those ancient jokers

The more overlong fights, the more featherfisted the boxers in them.

But most importantly...

25 rounds, IS A SIGN OF FAILURE. Failure to win by KO! It means that the plan has failed! Whether the plan was wrong, or your opponent was able to thwart it does not matter.

You take a NEGATIVE feature of the drunken era of boxing and turn it into a virtue.

Myth exposed!

Here is my last word on this matter or any other delusional matter you are on about:

You are entitled to your own opinion. PERIOD.

[ross]

What this person knows about boxing summed up...

Didn't know who Bob Foster was

[Max Power]

What this person knows about boxing summed up...

Didn't know who Bob Foster was

At some point, nobody knows who any boxer is, you learn of them as you learn of the sport.

Obviously, Bob Foster plays or would play absolutely zero role in any current or recent evaluation of boxers whatsoever, except as an example of how pathetic the opponents of Ali actually were in fact. Which is why I discovered him late. Other than that is is not particularly famous at all. Certainly not as famous as Huck!

He is testament to the weakness of an era which is thankfully gone and nothing like it will ever return, unless disease wipes out most of the globe and we must start from scratch

[Master]

Bob Foster is one of the greatest light heavyweights ever.

Huck is what?

[Max Power]

Bob Foster is one of the greatest light heavyweights ever.

Huck is what?

I don't think you understand completely what I am saying here.

The quality of Bob Foster, AS A BOXER, was very HIGH!

The quality of Bob Foster as a HW or CW boxer however, was not.

Today, the quality of Bob Foster as a HW or CW is non-existent.

As a light-HW? Well that's a WORTHY discussion. I'll give you that!

Personally I think he would be knocked out at the top level.

I mean really I cannot envision him surviving very long with Kovalev if already featherfist Ali, could waste him easy.

But again, as a BOXER, he was high quality, there is a difference.

[Master]

His opinions suck.

Period.