Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post
Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
Hey. You're predictions are just as much subjective as mine. Nobody will ever know. But Willard would win at least 4 rounds against Adamek, and hurt him in a couple clinches inside too. Those men could fight 25-30 rounds with broken bones, no neutral corner. The clowns you champion are totally winded after ten rounds. Sam Huffin & Puffin Peters, Wladimir Gaspin For Breath Klitschko, David Hurt Lil' Pinky Toe Haye, Odlanir "Ow My Calf Muscle" Solis. Etc
I have already shown multiple occasions that such overlong fights were ALWAYS a rarity.

In fact in the history of boxing, approx. 70,000 fights, approximately only 1,600, 2%! went 13+ rounds, 13+!!!

Of those old boxers that fought these 20 odd rounders, they only each fought negligible of them also!

The lighter the boxer, the more rounds they can fight,

Any boxer can fight any number of rounds no matter the conditioning or the size by pacing.

Todays 12 rounders fight harder and are better conditioned than any of those ancient jokers

The more overlong fights, the more featherfisted the boxers in them.

But most importantly...

25 rounds, IS A SIGN OF FAILURE. Failure to win by KO! It means that the plan has failed! Whether the plan was wrong, or your opponent was able to thwart it does not matter.

You take a NEGATIVE feature of the drunken era of boxing and turn it into a virtue.

Myth exposed!
Here is my last word on this matter or any other delusional matter you are on about:

You are entitled to your own opinion. PERIOD.