Pac should have never had that 3rd and 4th JMM fight!

[Marty]

It proved nothing. The third one was totally unnecessary. Do we really think that JMM is a better fighter than Manny Pac? Really?

You're right, it proved nothing. We already knew Marquez had the measure of Pacquiao, after being robbed by the judges twice, only to be robbed a third time and for Marquez to KO him in the fourth fight.

So yes, it proved nothing.

Doesnt necessarily mean Marquez is the better fighter though, he's just Pacquiao's 'bogey' opponent

[erics44]

It proved nothing. The third one was totally unnecessary. Do we really think that JMM is a better fighter than Manny Pac? Really?

You're right, it proved nothing. We already knew Marquez had the measure of Pacquiao, after being robbed by the judges twice, only to be robbed a third time and for Marquez to KO him in the fourth fight.

So yes, it proved nothing.

Doesnt necessarily mean Marquez is the better fighter though, he's just Pacquiao's 'bogey' opponent

this seems like the beginning of a who won pac or marquez debate

its ages since i watched 1 and 2, in my opinion 3 pac won 4 marquez won

[X]

'proved nothing', 'shouldn't have done it' ...... You're sounding like you support the Floyd Mayweather / Sugar Ray Leonard style of carefully managing one's career.

Pacquiaio is a fighter, he will fight anyone, and he will fight them as many times as they like. That's what I like about the guy, he knows he struggles with Marquez and doesn't look good against him, but he still gets into the ring with him. He knows Marquez is a deadly counterpuncher, but he still leads, pressures him and puts it all on the line.

That's one of the reasons that Pac is the fighters fighter!

[AdamGB]

The 3rd fight was one of the worst robberies at that level in years.

[chris6878]

Being a real man pac fought him over and over because he isnt afraid to take an L. He gave the guy many chances to win, and he finally did

[Ron Swanson]

Being a real man pac fought him over and over because he isnt afraid to take an L. He gave the guy many chances to win, and he finally did

For purposes of clarity, are you saying Pac won the first 3?

[chris6878]

Being a real man pac fought him over and over because he isnt afraid to take an L. He gave the guy many chances to win, and he finally did

For purposes of clarity, are you saying Pac won the first 3?

Manny Pacquiao - Boxer

[beenKOed]

Being a real man pac fought him over and over because he isnt afraid to take an L. He gave the guy many chances to win, and he finally did

For purposes of clarity, are you saying Pac won the first 3?

For purposes of clarity, there is always some doubt when it's a decision.😳