Anti matter

[SlimTrae]

finding a brand new way to see the universe is something that we must do on a daily and even nightly basis. Dark matter and dark energy are everywhere and nobody seems to know exactly what that is is there an antiparticle or an antique universe how about an uncle who is your uncle and does he live in this universe?

The Higgs boson or what some call the God-Particle seems to lead in this direction?

Meaning if we are privileged to define it: It could lead us to a plural answer.

That underneath that particle of existence which we will give a name to---- may be controlled by something even smaller or its dimensions will be just as incomprehensible- that we will label those- particle(s) that created the God particle Higgs boson . (The mother of Higgs boson particle LOL!)

To comprehend our (complete)existence may be futile—at least in the way that If we made or built something- we are the engineers of that which we produce; as an end result: we have a thorough understanding of how it came to be and why. We are capable of explaining it- but not capable of making someone comprehend it. Be they in a different society-or if we went to a different planet where beings havent progressed to even using structures made from matter that we'd call vehicles.

While we should strive to learn and pass our knowledge to the successive generations that may grow wiser than we- there is a limitation that sits with me:

Only the engineer/creator of a planet, star, galaxy, solar system can explain its structure and or origin; it composite.

But the one who listens is still subservient to what Greenz said- their perception and or perspective- which IMO at this time in the universe for us on what we call earth- is still carnal-even more so- from an infant’s perspective.
An infant in the scheme of universal creation.
If there was/is a singular creator- who came down right now and explained how it created itself- I think in our current state- it would be like putting a 1000 watt bulb in a 50 watt socket. It would BLOW our MINDS!

[Andre]

You ever think one energy decided to split up and go out into realms unknown for the sake of experience and you are just part thereof?

[brocktonblockbust]

You ever think one energy decided to split up and go out into realms unknown for the sake of experience and you are just part thereof?

when I was 18 years old and I came up with a crazy theory which 20 years later I read about in a philosophy book. I was jogging at night by myself and suddenly I ask myself quote and I quote What if God was lonely and God decided to destroy itself because God asked itself if it had the power to destroy itself could God destroy itself. But just before destroying itself got asked itself I wonder if I have the power to gather myself back together again after destroying myself. So the universe now is made up of the explosion on the self destruction of God the willful self destruction of God. This was just God testing itself testing to see if it had the power to put itself back together again. Could each particle in the universe have an essential godlike quality so that eventually given enough time all the particles will reassemble themselves back into the mind of God before the explosion or shall I say self destruction?

[SlimTrae]

Any of you think string theory is valid?

[walrus]

I have actually read a bit on string theory the Dali llama was fascinated with it and after reading some of his books it brought me to the string theory. I must admit a lot of what I read was over my head but much of it makes sense. The problem is for each paper that comes out about the theory another comes out poking holes in it. Very interesting regardless. A quick Google search is all you need.

[Beanz]

No Big Bang? Quantum equation predicts universe has no beginning


"The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once.
The widely accepted age of the universe, as estimated by general relativity, is 13.8 billion years. In the beginning, everything in existence is thought to have occupied a single infinitely dense point, or singularity. Only after this point began to expand in a "Big Bang" did the universe officially begin.
Although the Big Bang singularity arises directly and unavoidably from the mathematics of general relativity, some scientists see it as problematic because the math can explain only what happened immediately after—not at or before—the singularity.
"The Big Bang singularity is the most serious problem of general relativity because the laws of physics appear to break down there," Ahmed Farag Ali at Benha University and the Zewail City of Science and Technology, both in Egypt, told Phys.org.
Ali and coauthor Saurya Das at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada, have shown in a paper published in Physics Letters B that the Big Bang singularity can be resolved by their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end."

[SlimTrae]

I have actually read a bit on string theory the Dali llama was fascinated with it and after reading some of his books it brought me to the string theory. I must admit a lot of what I read was over my head but much of it makes sense. The problem is for each paper that comes out about the theory another comes out poking holes in it. Very interesting regardless. A quick Google search is all you need.

Dali... I'd like to smoke a joint with him & listen to some Laurie Anderson

[brocktonblockbust]

oh shit I thought for a minute you meant Salvador Dali !!!