Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Floyd would want to upstage Barrera and slam Prince into the turnbuckle at every corner.

naz would have KOed barera prime for prime


Really?? I thought Naz was pretty close to his prime when he got humiliated by MAB.
see above


Yeah..... I see your point.

27 is pretty much an over-the-hill age for a fighter.

See above

Compelling argument, as usual.
Nice chatting with you.
absolutely solid argument you are right

Naz was absolutely no where near his best against barrera, hed stopped being a boxer long before that fight

that much is very clear, trying to base an argument on him losing to mayweather prime for prime because he lost to barrera that night is a bit daft

Just like saying tyson would have lost to ali prime for prime because tyson lost to mcbride



Never mind Floyd.

Your claiming that:

1. Naz would've knocked out Barrera prime for prime, and
2. Naz was past his prime (at age 27) when he fought Barrera.....

Pretty much tells us everything we need to know about your boxing IQ.
ha brilliant, i know nothing about boxing, ha ah ah aaha ahahha, ha aha haha hahahahaha ha ha aahaha ha ha ha hahha haahhaa hahh

what an argument

going to tell me to go back to school or something next?

how about calling me a troll?


Why punch a guy who's busy slamming his own head against the wall?

awe what? you clearly know nothing about boxing!

ha ah ahahahahha a ahha a

funny