Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: FCC look to impliment Net Nutrality

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4185
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FCC look to impliment Net Nutrality

    Interesting I always learn something new reading what all you guys have to say on stuff.

    On a side note, couldnt the government bodies one day blame terrorism for the reason they are shutting down all public internet communications?

    Is that a power they have already or one they are after,in the name of national security or something?

    I imagine they would want that finger on the switch behind all the business that supplies it to us.

    In the mean time I see they use the term conspiracy to their advantage regarding control of the public mind set regarding many things. So much so that the term has now globally taken on a whole new meaning from the original; So there are controls and there is control.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    6,462
    Mentioned
    197 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    706
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FCC look to impliment Net Nutrality

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Interesting I always learn something new reading what all you guys have to say on stuff.

    On a side note, couldnt the government bodies one day blame terrorism for the reason they are shutting down all public internet communications?

    Very good point. I think they have that in the makings- but it will be for a candidate trying to win office if/when it does happen.

    Is that a power they have already or one they are after,in the name of national security or something?

    I just watched some wanna be muslim dude who is in Deerborne, Michagan in America & he claims that he only had 100 thousand hits on his website, then when republicans started blaming Obama for not saying Muslims aint shit enough, well now he has 400 thousand hits..and thanks to the politicians, he has more followers ready to become homegrown terrorists; now aint that some shit?

    I imagine they would want that finger on the switch behind all the business that supplies it to us.


    In the mean time I see they use the term conspiracy to their advantage regarding control of the public mind set regarding many things. So much so that the term has now globally taken on a whole new meaning from the original; So there are controls and there is control.

    Yes I agree they use the term conspiracy to their advantage.

    One thing about this freedom word, though: when it comes to the net- is- somebody is paying somebody something somewhere.

    That beenverified.com I mentioned. Type your name up.
    It will accumulate shit about you from tickets, arrests, & get this: personal links to shit like facebook. And while it tallies all your info up-where you live, your next of kin it will say: No one will know you are getting informaton on Andre. And I'm thinking damn, so I can get information on Andre, but he cant be informed I AM DOING THIS? My point is: this shit aint in cyberspace.
    Thats the process.
    It is stored on a database right?
    Databases are stored on physical objects/boxes called servers, correct?
    Servers owned by major corporations that makes Unix, Linux.
    Then processed by midrange or mainframes owned by IBM, routed by Cisco.
    Space maintenence called DASD. These are billion dollar corporations who send, recieve & store all of our shit, from AOl.com, to Facebook to Googlemail. It is stored. Well who is storing it?
    A jihadist, crazed lover lost his woman, thanks to the net- can find you your next of kin and fuck up the program all day long.

    When it is all said & done, they throw us IMO a smokescreen doggy bone with no meet -called Net neutrality. So we are focused on the speed of sending and recieiving, & if it will cost $$-- but not who is responsible for the storage, maintenence of this shit ..for starters.

    Thank goodness for net neutrality- we can continue to downlown our porn at speeds that big companies wanted to charge us for. Thank goodness we can continue to blog on saddo at the rate of the speed of light, but not be concerned on who can gather this information and where.

    Meanwhile in some warehouse that has clouding centers where data is located: someone has accumulated everytime you typed up chunkyass.com How long were you there.
    Somewhere we have information gathered about our lives, our relatives and ready to be bundled up and sent to shit like beenverified.com...for a nominal fee.

    See if Republicans or Democrats were worth a shit? That's the shit they should be talking about in the Senate & Congress. But the Sheeple are too worried about net neutrality with code words like: Your freedom is being treaded on or...Is it consitutional. Let the partisan war begin...I mean continue

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,153
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2013
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FCC look to impliment Net Nutrality

    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Interesting I always learn something new reading what all you guys have to say on stuff.

    On a side note, couldnt the government bodies one day blame terrorism for the reason they are shutting down all public internet communications?

    Is that a power they have already or one they are after,in the name of national security or something?

    I imagine they would want that finger on the switch behind all the business that supplies it to us.

    In the mean time I see they use the term conspiracy to their advantage regarding control of the public mind set regarding many things. So much so that the term has now globally taken on a whole new meaning from the original; So there are controls and there is control.
    They don't want to shut the internet off because they already get to listen into everything you say and do over the net and your phone line.

  4. #4
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: FCC look to impliment Net Nutrality

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Andre View Post
    Interesting I always learn something new reading what all you guys have to say on stuff.

    On a side note, couldnt the government bodies one day blame terrorism for the reason they are shutting down all public internet communications?

    Is that a power they have already or one they are after,in the name of national security or something?

    I imagine they would want that finger on the switch behind all the business that supplies it to us.

    In the mean time I see they use the term conspiracy to their advantage regarding control of the public mind set regarding many things. So much so that the term has now globally taken on a whole new meaning from the original; So there are controls and there is control.
    They don't want to shut the internet off because they already get to listen into everything you say and do over the net and your phone line.
    And the telegraph line too .....phone line ..... ok Andy Rooney

    "When I was a boy during the summers the ice man used to chip off slivers of ice for us to eat and then we'd play in the fire hydrants....it was 1890"

    Old git




    Also you DO realize that like most things the government does this will lead to loads of new taxes and regulations......oh of course you do because you like those things....oh well back to your shuffleboard and tapioca pudding

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing