Pac vs Floyd prediction

[Chino]

I don't think it'd be easy for either guy I'm predicting Pac by SD. he'll win rounds mostly by being more active then Floyd.

I was thinking the same thing but then again look at the outcome of Floyd vs Oscar fight. Oscar was throwing punches from all over the place while Floyd countered effectively and look how that fight ended.

[Maravilla2012]

I don't think it'd be easy for either guy I'm predicting Pac by SD. he'll win rounds mostly by being more active then Floyd.

I was thinking the same thing but then again look at the outcome of Floyd vs Oscar fight. Oscar was throwing punches from all over the place while Floyd countered effectively and look how that fight ended.

And that's a younger Floyd with better reflexes.

[Big-mike13]

Mayweather has a rematch clause, I don't think pac does. Therefore, the only way to guarantee a rematch (another $300+ million purse) is a pac win. I suspect pac by close, controversial decision because that's just how it works.

[brucelee]

Pac should watch how de la hoya ( in my card) defeated Mayweather.

If de la Hoya can do it to Mayweather, how much more the Pacman?

If Pac blazes Mayweather early, I see a TKO in the 10 to 12 round. Mayweather hasn't seen anything like the Pacman except the Judah fight during the early rounds. Watch it guys and say to me if I am wrong.

[fan johnny]

Mayweather has a rematch clause, I don't think pac does. Therefore, the only way to guarantee a rematch (another $300+ million purse) is a pac win. I suspect pac by close, controversial decision because that's just how it works.

Nope: Op-Ed: Why no rematch clause was provided in Mayweather-Pacquiao deal

[fan johnny]

I don't think it'd be easy for either guy I'm predicting Pac by SD. he'll win rounds mostly by being more active then Floyd.

I was thinking the same thing but then again look at the outcome of Floyd vs Oscar fight. Oscar was throwing punches from all over the place while Floyd countered effectively and look how that fight ended.

I think the difference in footwork, speed and angles that Pac brings makes this a very different fight than what Floyd had with Oscar. More clinching from Floyd if they are close. It will be very interesting to see how Floyd works his timing pot shots. I see Pac getting tagged with that straight Right now and then, but I'm not so sure the left hook to the head works, maybe to the body.

[#1FightFan]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

[Max Power]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

That's a very real possibility unfortunately...

And that would utterly suck should that eventuate.

[SugarBoxing]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

That's a very real possibility unfortunately...

And that would utterly suck should that eventuate.

Yo, @Max Power, how does Max Powerism 101 is applied to the current case?

The age difference is only 1-2 years, I think your theory (newer is bigger & bigger is better => never is better ) finds singularity in this case and give inaccurate results
It only works when there is generation difference between fighters )), so they could not have fought in the same time

Pac Size < May Size
Pac Age < May Age

REsults? Pac Vs May ~ 1/0

[Max Power]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

That's a very real possibility unfortunately...

And that would utterly suck should that eventuate.

Yo, @Max Power, how does Max Powerism 101 is applied to the current case?

The age difference is only 1-2 years, I think your theory (newer is bigger & bigger is better => never is better ) finds singularity in this case and give inaccurate results
It only works when there is generation difference between fighters )), so they could not have fought in the same time

Pac Size < May Size
Pac Age < May Age

REsults? Pac Vs May ~ 1/0

I never said that the biggest or the oldest would always win.

Max Powerism is clearly defined as being the bigger man has an advantage to win. The most experienced fighter has an advantage to win (which is often the older one) which is proven by stats across the board.

Experience is similar, I would even say Pac has the slightly better experiences.

The size difference at bout will be negligible.

Some of the size differences we are talking about in previous generation or HW otherwise comparisons are involving large differences.

Of course cross era generations involve past boxers who even if they were of similar size and experience, they have not the same power and athleticism gained through modern training and their experiences are against smaller and bummier boxers also.

[Master]

This thread needs a poll

[Andre]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

That's a very real possibility unfortunately...

And that would utterly suck should that eventuate.

Yo, @Max Power , how does Max Powerism 101 is applied to the current case?

The age difference is only 1-2 years, I think your theory (newer is bigger & bigger is better => never is better ) finds singularity in this case and give inaccurate results
It only works when there is generation difference between fighters )), so they could not have fought in the same time

Pac Size < May Size
Pac Age < May Age

REsults? Pac Vs May ~ 1/0

I never said that the biggest or the oldest would always win.

Max Powerism is clearly defined as being the bigger man has an advantage to win. The most experienced fighter has an advantage to win (which is often the older one) which is proven by stats across the board.

Experience is similar, I would even say Pac has the slightly better experiences.

The size difference at bout will be negligible.

Some of the size differences we are talking about in previous generation or HW otherwise comparisons are involving large differences.

Of course cross era generations involve past boxers who even if they were of similar size and experience, they have not the same power and athleticism gained through modern training and their experiences are against smaller and bummier boxers also.

Check the reach difference here! That can determine another controlling factor in this fight.I think Floyd has advantages on the outer and the inner game. If Manny is to catch him hard it will be in the transition.

[Chino]

Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.

Maybe Floyd wins but gets robbed by judges the same way they did when Juanma faced Pacquiao 3 times.

[brocktonblockbust]

if anyone is gettin robbed on points it will be PAC.

[Chino]

if anyone is gettin robbed on points it will be PAC.

Remember Manny vs Juanma 1, 2, and 3? Things might work on Pac's favor.


But for Pac fans to say he will get robbed sounds more like excuses knowing that Floyd seems to be a better all-around boxer and technician with longer reach. It's like Floyd fans saying "They shouldn't exchange punches cuz that is a dumb way to win a fight" knowing Pacquiao can brawl if necessary.