
Originally Posted by
NVSemin

Originally Posted by
Max Power

Originally Posted by
#1FightFan
Pac wins but gets robbed by floyds judges/refs/venue.
That's a very real possibility unfortunately...
And that would utterly suck should that eventuate.
Yo, @
Max Power , how does Max Powerism 101 is applied to the current case?
The age difference is only 1-2 years, I think your theory (newer is bigger & bigger is better => never is better ) finds singularity in this case and give inaccurate results
It only works when there is generation difference between fighters

)), so they could not have fought in the same time
Pac Size < May Size
Pac Age < May Age
REsults? Pac Vs May ~ 1/0
I never said that the biggest or the oldest would always win.
Max Powerism is clearly defined as being the bigger man has an advantage to win. The most experienced fighter has an advantage to win (which is often the older one) which is proven by stats across the board.
Experience is similar, I would even say Pac has the slightly better experiences.
The size difference at bout will be negligible.
Some of the size differences we are talking about in previous generation or HW otherwise comparisons are involving large differences.
Of course cross era generations involve past boxers who even if they were of similar size and experience, they have not the same power and athleticism gained through modern training and their experiences are against smaller and bummier boxers also.
Bookmarks