Quote Originally Posted by Max Power View Post

Also it's weight class specific. The lighter the weight, the more fights you can have against quality opposition.

.
Good point.

The smaller weight class usually have more fights or options. So would that mean they can burn out quicker?

A feather @ age 30 is equivalent to a HW @ age 35? (if their level of comp assumed is the same?)

Specific- the thread Berto-Lopez was stated Berto may not be able to fight top opposition. But I questioned- maybe he has?? 10 years in the game, 3 -4 years to get title shot.
When he did -won & held it for a about 4 years.

NO right or wrong answer - I just question: Isnt that sufficient to call him at least a durable champion?

Flip the script_ if a fghter holds any belt(s) longer than 5 years, doesnt that open up the argument that it HAD to have been padded? Or that the class was weak as hell?
Kind of a double edged sword question I guess! If a fighter loses a title after 4 years then he aint shit. But if he holds it longer than 5, well he fought soft opposition.

Just wondering if you or anyone here can present a case where someone did more in 10 years than someone in 20 years? Once again no right or wrong; all opinions welcome!