Scientific Fraud

[El Kabong]

� Video: UN Climate Change Official Says “We Should Make Every Effort” To Depopulate The Planet Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!


Yeah because that's a GREAT idea

[El Kabong]

NOAA Tampers With Data To Erase The Global Warming 'Hiatus' | The Daily Caller


I know we put out data before and it showed a hiatus....but for serious, we like totally went back over the data and yeah sure we adjusted and tweaked some things and now it looks like we were continuing to warm, but for real I mean this is legitimate sciencey stuff and now Global Warming is worse than ever.....we're being super serial!


......and yet people will STILL buy this horse shit, people won't question having their fucking rights trampled all over because of a fucking hoax because "the world depends on us to change".....this whole thing is asinine!

[El Kabong]

So according to Bill Nye it's the JOB of the government to redistribute wealth. So he's advocating saving the environment via totalitarian government.....which of course means China has a brilliant flourishing environ.....wait a second

[Andre]

Ive noticed on social media people are using the term global warming less and are going for climate change tag instead which is more just I think.

[killersheep]

Lyle, which part of the model do you believe to be the cause of the hoax issues?

[El Kabong]

Nobel-winning physicist who backed Obama: Prez 'dead wrong' on global warming - Washington Times





.....but you know people will be out killing this guy's character in no time!

[El Kabong]

Lyle, which part of the model do you believe to be the cause of the hoax issues?

Well which models are the right ones for starters? Is it the first edition or the revision or the revision of the revision? Do you not question when "scientists" go back and change the data....to me that's not science, that's moving the goalposts in order to help your hypothesis.

Why would someone do that? Grant money....funding....if there is no problem, then nobody needs to be paid to solve the problem, and that is a problem for the people who depend on this money. Now people will of course say "oil companies, big gas, those guys have money invested in proving this wrong, what about them" ....how's it any different from the government trying to prove it right? Do you think the government has our best interests at heart on this issue?

[killersheep]

Lyle, which part of the model do you believe to be the cause of the hoax issues?

Well which models are the right ones for starters? Is it the first edition or the revision or the revision of the revision? Do you not question when "scientists" go back and change the data....to me that's not science, that's moving the goalposts in order to help your hypothesis.

Why would someone do that? Grant money....funding....if there is no problem, then nobody needs to be paid to solve the problem, and that is a problem for the people who depend on this money. Now people will of course say "oil companies, big gas, those guys have money invested in proving this wrong, what about them" ....how's it any different from the government trying to prove it right? Do you think the government has our best interests at heart on this issue?

Science is self correcting as more data becomes more available and in most cases just more accessible. Yes there have been cases of intentional bad data being entered, this is the case in anything that humans are involved in.

As for specific models, let's break it down...........do you believe the greenhouse effect is quantifiable as a mathematical model?

Start here for current views
NASA Estimates 'Liquid Assets' of World's Water Budget | NASA