Frampton v. Quigg - Who should be blamed for it not happening?

[Master]

So, the consensus is that it is Frampton's side that is holding this up. It's a shame because I would pick Frampton to win.

Forget the consensus I speak the truth and Quigg is lucky Frampton is sticking to his contract with ITV.

[Vendettos]

Scott Quigg.

Frampton challenged him live on sky sports while Quigg was a pundit.

Directly after the challenge it cut to Quigg in the studio and he couldn't talk, looking off the set to someone like he didn't know what to say.

Quigg has that annoying habit of avoiding questions he is asked directly.

[erics44]

i wish i had an interesting contribution to this thread

[Vendettos]

i wish i had an interesting contribution to this thread

Loool

Love the honesty... "I aint got a fucking clue". Lol

[erics44]

i wish i had an interesting contribution to this thread

Loool

Love the honesty... "I aint got a fucking clue". Lol

exactly

who knows

i reckon it will happen one day tho, just hope its some time soon

[ono]

I think they both want a few soft defences before they fight eachother if i'm honest. I tend to think the Hearn offer was more for show than anything. Other than Rigo, Santa Cruz and maybe Donaire, there isn't much knocking about at 122. Rigo is a guaranteed loss for either fighter. Donaire is a danger if the Walters fight didn't finish him off, as is Santa Cruz. I think Quigg vs Frampton is a small stadium fight if it's left to brew properly, and stadium fights are summer occasions, so i can see them avoiding eachother until next summer. Maybe Quigg can fight Kiko Martinez and Frampton can get a beatable name like Romero maybe. By next summer it will be interesting to see where Kid Galahad fits in aswell.