Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
It's great to be Vitali and be propped up by Wlads accomplishments.

Wlad had the better kickboxing career but "Vitali was better"

Wlad had the far more successful amateur boxing career but "Vitali was better"

Wlad had an even greater gulf between his pro career and Vitali but "Vitali was better"

The guy that routinely far exceeded the other is always lesser because this guy thinks and that guy thinks. Shows you that what you actually do is completely fucking irrelevant. You want to know why fighters look for paydays rather than actual glory take a good long look in the mirror because you have made genuine accomplishment irrelevant.

Nah. Although you are correct in that Wlad has the better all around performance, in a hypothetical battle against Vitali, we need to compare the positive and negative traits of each man. It just so happens that Vitali has the right positive traits to be a nightmare for Wladimir. Slightly bigger, solid chin, awkward, and with a decent punch. I just can't see Wladimir being victorious.


Obviously this is considering if they were to fight each other as if they were not actually brothers. I'm just looking at the traits.