Quote Originally Posted by pacfan View Post
Real boxing does not work this way, honey. I've seen tons of this type of simplistic and straightforward analysis that all ended up where they belong - in the dumps. Boxing is not simple arithmetics. If you really want to understand boxing, you'll have to learn how to box so you can see the so-called intangibles of the sport. Have you ever wondered in spite your careful analysis why many great boxers and trainers believe Pac has some chances to win the fight? It's because they can see what ordinary folks can't see. For example, how will Floyd react if get hit by a big one, something he has never tasted before? Will he be able to take it or will he get rattled and loses his rhythm, or even kd'd? And this is just one of the many examples...
@pacfan

@Pac Fan,
Hey man what Intangibles were you mouthing, you ain't know about boxing.
PLEASE LOOK AT MY BRAGGING RIGHT, THE ONLY (WANNABE) BOXING ANALYST THAT DISPROVE VETERAN ANAL LIST , ER, ANALYSTS IN THE PHILIPPINES

'I boldly predicted on media Pacquiao’s defeat to Mayweather

By MORTZ C. ORTIGOZA

Please bear with my Bragging Right's antics: Thanks to diligent research and meticulous observation on the strengths and weaknesses of the richest sportsman on earth Floyd Mayweather and Filipino boxing hero Manny Pacquiao, I did not only win against those gullible bettors, but against all odds including those boxing analysts in the Philippines, I fearlessly predicted on my TV and radio interviews and on my column Mayweather would defeat Pacquiao on their Flight, er Fight of the Century's match last May 3.http://****************************/...pacquiaos.html