Froch stripped of his WBA belt

**mrbig1** · 05-10-2015 04:36 AM

Originally Posted by Freedom

The WBA is the worst sanctioning organization.

Why strip Froch, but not Ward, who has been inactive 18 months?

You beat me to it. I was wondering the same thing.

**Ron Swanson** · 05-10-2015 12:23 PM

Originally Posted by mrbig1

Originally Posted by Freedom

The WBA is the worst sanctioning organization.

Why strip Froch, but not Ward, who has been inactive 18 months?

You beat me to it. I was wondering the same thing.

Because of the rules. The Super Champion is like a title, the regular champion has the responsibilities. Froch is retiring anyway.

**Dia bando** · 05-10-2015 03:08 PM

How long should a Champion be allowed to keep his belt, if he does not defend his title Ward
has been injured and keeps his title, strange but contenders should have a chance to fight
for the title.!
But we no it's not as simple as that is it,! the rating of all the governing body's are full of
what's he doing there fighters, they are not there on merit,! just by who's palms you have greased
to get there.